IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i7-8p1254-1266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurse managed patient focused assessment and care: A grounded theory of qualified nurses in acute and critical care settings assessing the mental capacity of adult patients

Author

Listed:
  • Sian Jones
  • Paul Gill
  • Joyce Kenkre

Abstract

Aims To explore processes used by qualified nurses in assessing mental capacity of acutely and critically ill hospitalised adult patients. Background Mental capacity is the ability to understand, reason and make decisions. Acute and critical illness may impact upon the decision‐making abilities of hospitalised adult patients but little is known about how qualified nurses across a range of acute settings assess the capacity of such patients in their care. Design A qualitative grounded theory approach informed by the Corbin and Strauss (Basics of Qualitative Research (Third Edition). London, UK: Sage, 2008) methodological pathway. Methods Data were collected through digitally recorded, semi‐structured interviews to explore assessment of capacity processes used by 13 registered nurses employed in acute and critical care environments in a district general hospital in South Wales, UK. Data were analysed using iterative constant comparative processes leading to a core category and grounded theory. The study is presented in accordance with the COREQ checklist. Results Informal, intuitive, holistic nurse‐led processes were used to assess the mental capacity of patients which combined processes for the assessment of their physiological and mental capacity status, recognising the need to support their rights, dignity and autonomy. The assessment of mental capacity was not a lone process but one that contributed to a cyclical process in which multi‐professional assessment was necessary and ongoing, and in which qualified nurses had a co‐ordinating role. This led to the development of the theory, Nurse Managed Patient Focused Assessment and Care. Conclusion This theory provides a framework to explain processes and strategies used by qualified nurses in assessing mental capacity of, and caring for, adult patients with acute and/or critical illness. Relevance to clinical practice This framework may inform related clinical practice and can serve as a basis of an assessment tool in what has been identified as a fundamental role of the qualified nurse.

Suggested Citation

  • Sian Jones & Paul Gill & Joyce Kenkre, 2020. "Nurse managed patient focused assessment and care: A grounded theory of qualified nurses in acute and critical care settings assessing the mental capacity of adult patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1254-1266, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1254-1266
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15188
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lynch, Johanna M. & Askew, Deborah A. & Mitchell, Geoffrey K. & Hegarty, Kelsey L., 2012. "Beyond symptoms: Defining primary care mental health clinical assessment priorities, content and process," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 143-149.
    2. Jean E Pretz & Victoria N Folse, 2011. "Nursing experience and preference for intuition in decision making," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(19‐20), pages 2878-2889, October.
    3. Scott Lamont & Yun‐Hee Jeon & Mary Chiarella, 2013. "Assessing patient capacity to consent to treatment: an integrative review of instruments and tools," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(17-18), pages 2387-2403, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stanley KK Lam & Enid WY Kwong & Maria SY Hung & Samantha MC Pang, 2016. "Bridging the gap between guidelines and practice in the management of emerging infectious diseases: a qualitative study of emergency nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2895-2905, October.
    2. Shiah‐Lian Chen & Hsiu‐Ying Hsu & Chin‐Fu Chang & Esther Ching‐Lan Lin, 2016. "An exploration of the correlates of nurse practitioners’ clinical decision‐making abilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1016-1024, April.
    3. Imbulana Arachchi, Janaki & Managi, Shunsuke, 2021. "Preferences for energy sustainability: Different effects of gender on knowledge and importance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Christine W. Nibbelink & Barbara B. Brewer, 2018. "Decision‐making in nursing practice: An integrative literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 917-928, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1254-1266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.