IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i7-8p1209-1219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ perceptions of and barriers to the optimal end‐of‐life care in hospitals: A cross‐sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen W. H. Chan
  • Meyrick C. M. Chow
  • Sally Chan
  • Robert Sanson‐Fisher
  • Amy Waller
  • Theresa T. K. Lai
  • Cecilia W. M. Kwan

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess nurses’ perceptions of what constitutes optimal end‐of‐life (EOL) care in hospital and evaluate nurses’ perceived barriers to EOL care delivery. Background Care of dying patients is common in hospitals. However, little is known about the important elements of and barriers to optimal EOL care from key service providers’ perspective, which is crucial for quality EOL care in hospital settings. Method This is a cross‐sectional survey. Nurses practising in hospitals recruited by convenience sampling completed self‐report survey questionnaires. STROBE checklist was used in study reporting. Results One hundred and‐seventy‐five nurses participated in the survey. The majority (70%) had experience in caring for dying patients. The five most highly perceived factors constituting optimal EOL care included the following: “families know and follow patient's EOL wishes”; “patients emotional concerns identified and managed well”; “patients participating in decision‐making”; “EOL care documents stored well and easily accessed”; and “provide private rooms and unlimited visiting hours for families of dying patients”. Top five barriers were “doctors are too busy”; “nurses are too busy”; “insufficient private room/space”; “nurses have limited training in EOL care”; and “families have unrealistic expectations of patient's prognosis.” Multivariate regression analysis identified that nurses without experience in caring for dying patients reported a significantly higher number of perceived barriers towards EOL care (p = .012). Those with postgraduate degree training reported significantly fewer perceived barriers (p = .007). Conclusion Findings identified essential elements for optimal hospital EOL care not only involving patients and families in EOL decision and care, but also documentation and environmental issues in the healthcare system level and the needs for strengthening manpower and expertise at palliative care policy level. Relevance to clinical practice This study revealed quantitative data to inform health service managers and policy makers in terms of training and service development/ re‐design for EOL care in hospital settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen W. H. Chan & Meyrick C. M. Chow & Sally Chan & Robert Sanson‐Fisher & Amy Waller & Theresa T. K. Lai & Cecilia W. M. Kwan, 2020. "Nurses’ perceptions of and barriers to the optimal end‐of‐life care in hospitals: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1209-1219, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1209-1219
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15160
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15160?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anita Raymond & Susan F Lee & Melissa J Bloomer, 2017. "Understanding the bereavement care roles of nurses within acute care: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1787-1800, July.
    2. Judith A. Adams & Donald E. Bailey & Ruth A. Anderson & Sharron L. Docherty, 2011. "Nursing Roles and Strategies in End-of-Life Decision Making in Acute Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2011, pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jihee Choi & Minkyung Gu & Sunyoung Oh & Sohyune Sok, 2022. "Relationship between End-of-Life Care Stress, Death Anxiety, and Self-Efficacy of Clinical Nurses in South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-9, January.
    2. Sara Maria Oliveira Pinto & Sílvia Maria Alves Caldeira Berenguer & José Carlos Amado Martins, 2013. "Cancer, Health Literacy, and Happiness: Perspectives from Patients under Chemotherapy," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2013, pages 1-8, September.
    3. Carme Berbís‐Morelló & Gerard Mora‐López & Marta Berenguer‐Poblet & Laia Raigal‐Aran & Pilar Montesó‐Curto & Carme Ferré‐Grau, 2019. "Exploring family members’ experiences during a death process in the emergency department: A grounded theory study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 2790-2800, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:7-8:p:1209-1219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.