IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i3-4p602-612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient safety before and after implementing person‐centred inpatient care — A quasi‐experimental study

Author

Listed:
  • Sofie Jakobsson
  • Gisela Ringström
  • Eva Andersson
  • Björn Eliasson
  • Gudmundur Johannsson
  • Magnus Simrén
  • Eva Jakobsson Ung

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate aspects of patient safety before and after a person‐centred (PC) inpatient care intervention. Background Transitioning from disease‐centred to person‐centred care requires great effort but can improve patient safety. Design A quasi‐experimental study with data collection preceding and 12 months after a PC inpatient care intervention. Methods The study consecutively recruited adult patients (2014, n = 263; 2015/2016, n = 221) admitted to an inpatient care unit. The patients reported experiences of care at discharge and their perceived pain at admission and discharge. Medical records were reviewed to gather data on medications, planned care and clinical observations. The study is reported according to TREND guidelines. Results At discharge, patients receiving PC inpatient care reported competent medical‐technical care. Patients receiving PC inpatient care reported more effective pain relief. Updated prescribed medications at the ward were maintained, and patients were made aware of planned medical care to higher extent during PC inpatient care. The assessment of pulse and body temperature was maintained, but fewer elective care patients had their blood pressure taken during PC inpatient care. Weight assessment was not prioritised during usual or PC inpatient care. Conclusions Patients receiving PC inpatient care reported that they were given the best possible care and had less pain at discharge. The PC inpatient care included improved documentation and communication of planned medical care to the patients. Vital signs were more frequently recorded for patients admitted for acute care than patients admitted for elective care. PC inpatient care had no effect on frequency of weight measurements. Relevance to clinical practice PC inpatient care seems beneficial for the patients. Aspects of patient safety such as prescribed medications were maintained, and PC inpatient care seems to enhance the continuity of care. Inpatient clinical observations need further evaluation as healthcare transitions from disease‐centred to person‐centred care.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofie Jakobsson & Gisela Ringström & Eva Andersson & Björn Eliasson & Gudmundur Johannsson & Magnus Simrén & Eva Jakobsson Ung, 2020. "Patient safety before and after implementing person‐centred inpatient care — A quasi‐experimental study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 602-612, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:3-4:p:602-612
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eirin Sigurdssøn Ludvigsen & Øystein Øygarden Flæten & Caryl L Gay & Magnus TarAngen & Tove Irene Granheim & Anners Lerdal, 2016. "Pain and concomitant symptoms in medical and elective surgical inpatients: a point prevalence survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(21-22), pages 3229-3240, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anners Lerdal & Line Wangsvik Sigurdsen & Heidi Hammerstad & Tove Irene Granheim & Risk Study Research Group & Caryl L Gay, 2018. "Associations between patient symptoms and falls in an acute care hospital: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1826-1835, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:3-4:p:602-612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.