IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i3-4p492-502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“It is still intense and not unambiguous.” Nurses' experiences in the euthanasia care process 15 years after legalisation

Author

Listed:
  • Marthe Bellens
  • Elisa Debien
  • Fien Claessens
  • Chris Gastmans
  • Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how Flemish nurses working in hospitals and home care experience their involvement in the care of patients requesting euthanasia 15 years after the legalisation of euthanasia. Background Euthanasia was legalised in Belgium in 2002. Despite prior research that charted the experiences of nurses in euthanasia care before and right after legalisation in Belgium, it remains unclear how Flemish nurses currently, 15 years after the legalisation, experience their involvement. Design A grounded theory design, using semi‐structured in‐depth interviews. Methods We interviewed 26 nurses working in hospitals or in home care, who had experience with caring for patients requesting euthanasia. Data were collected using a purposive sample and then a snowball sample. Data collection and data analysis were conducted simultaneously. Data were analysed by using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. The study adhered to the COREQ guidelines. Results Caring for a patient requesting euthanasia continues to be an intense experience characterised by ambivalence. The nature of euthanasia itself contributes to the intensity of this care process. The nurses described euthanasia as something unnatural and planned that generated many questions and doubts. Nevertheless, most interviewees stated that they were able to contribute to a dignified end of life and make a difference, giving them a profound feeling of professional fulfilment. However, when nurses were not able to contribute to good euthanasia care, they struggled with strong negative feelings and frustrations. Conclusion Although the results suggest some subtle shifts in nurses' experiences over time, they do not indicate perceptions of euthanasia as a normal practice by the nurses involved. Relevance to clinical practice The study reveals the need for more clarification of nurses' ethical responsibility in euthanasia care and their role as moral agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Marthe Bellens & Elisa Debien & Fien Claessens & Chris Gastmans & Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé, 2020. "“It is still intense and not unambiguous.” Nurses' experiences in the euthanasia care process 15 years after legalisation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 492-502, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:3-4:p:492-502
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15110
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yvonne Denier & Chris Gastmans & Nele De Bal & Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé, 2010. "Communication in nursing care for patients requesting euthanasia: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(23‐24), pages 3372-3380, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:3-4:p:492-502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.