IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i3-4p437-446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How people with dementia perceive a therapeutic robot called PARO in relation to their pain and mood: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Lihui Pu
  • Wendy Moyle
  • Cindy Jones

Abstract

Background Interacting with social robots, such as the robotic seal PARO, has been shown to improve mood and acute pain for people with dementia. Little attention has been paid to the effect of PARO on people with dementia and chronic pain. Objective To explore how people with mild to moderate dementia and chronic pain perceive PARO as an alternative intervention to manage their pain and mood. Design A descriptive qualitative approach nested within a pilot randomised controlled trial. Methods Participants with dementia and chronic pain were recruited from three residential aged care facilities. They interacted with PARO for 30 min, 5 days a week over a 6‐week period. A sample of 11 participants completed individual semi‐structured interviews at the end of the intervention. Data were collected from January 2018–January 2019. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken. Reporting of findings followed the COREQ checklist. Results Four themes emerged from the data: (a) perceptions of PARO; (b) therapeutic effects of PARO; (c) limitations of PARO; and (d) programme improvement. Residents with dementia expressed positive attitudes towards the use of PARO and acknowledged the therapeutic benefits of PARO on mood improvement and relaxation for pain relief but also mentioned the limitations of its weight, voice and characteristics. Residents' responses could also fluctuate during the intervention process, and individual preferences need to be considered. Conclusions The PARO intervention is a promising intervention to improve positive emotion, and there is some anecdotal evidence that pain may be decreased from the perspectives of people living with chronic pain and dementia. Relevance to clinical practice Long‐term care staff may incorporate PARO therapy into daily dementia care. Understanding of individual's preferences may enhance the implementation of PARO for pain management in this group.

Suggested Citation

  • Lihui Pu & Wendy Moyle & Cindy Jones, 2020. "How people with dementia perceive a therapeutic robot called PARO in relation to their pain and mood: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 437-446, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:3-4:p:437-446
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tijs Vandemeulebroucke & Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé & Laura Welbergen & Michiel Massart & Chris Gastmans & Deborah Carr, 0. "The Ethics of Socially Assistive Robots in Aged Care. A Focus Group Study With Older Adults in Flanders, Belgium," Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(9), pages 1996-2007.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:3-4:p:437-446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.