IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i23-24p4806-4817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses' protocol‐based care decision‐making: a multiple case study

Author

Listed:
  • Mónica Vázquez‐Calatayud
  • Cristina Oroviogoicoechea
  • Laura Pittiglio
  • María Jesús Pumar‐Méndez

Abstract

Aim To describe and explain nurses' protocol‐based care decision‐making. Background Protocol‐based care is a strategy to reduce variability in clinical practice. There are no studies looking at protocol‐based care decision‐making. Understand this process is key to successful implementation. Method A multiple embedded case study was carried out. Nurses' protocol‐based care decision‐making was studied in three inpatient wards (medical, surgical and medical‐surgical) of a university hospital in northern Spain. Data collection was performed between 2015 and 2016 including documentary analysis, non‐participant observations, participant observations and interviews. Analysis of quantitative data involved descriptive statistics and qualitative data was submitted to Burnard's method of content analysis (1996). The data integration comprised the integration of the data set of each case separately and the integration of the findings resulting from the comparison of the cases. The following the thread method of data integration was used for this purpose. The SRQR guideline was used for reporting. Results The multiple embedded case study revealed protocol‐based care decision‐making as a linear and variable process that depends on the context and consists of multiple interrelated elements, among which the risk perception is foremost. Conclusion This study has allowed progress in protocol‐based care decision‐making characterisation. This knowledge is crucial to support the design of educational and management strategies aimed at implementing protocol‐based care. Relevance to clinical practice Strategies to promote protocol‐based care should address the contexts of practice and the ability of professionals' to accurately assess the degree of risk of clinical activity. Hence, it will promote quality of care, patient safety and efficiency in healthcare cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Mónica Vázquez‐Calatayud & Cristina Oroviogoicoechea & Laura Pittiglio & María Jesús Pumar‐Méndez, 2020. "Nurses' protocol‐based care decision‐making: a multiple case study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(23-24), pages 4806-4817, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4806-4817
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15524
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15524?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parker, Dianne & Lawton, Rebecca, 2000. "Judging the use of clinical protocols by fellow professionals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 669-677, September.
    2. Jonathan Karnon & Orla Caffrey & Clarabelle Pham & Richard Grieve & David Ben‐Tovim & Paul Hakendorf & Maria Crotty, 2013. "Applying Risk Adjusted Cost‐Effectiveness (Rac‐E) Analysis To Hospitals: Estimating The Costs And Consequences Of Variation In Clinical Practice," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(6), pages 631-642, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nils Gutacker & Andrew Street, 2015. "Multidimensional performance assessment using dominance criteria," Working Papers 115cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
    2. Mackintosh, Nicola & Humphrey, Charlotte & Sandall, Jane, 2014. "The habitus of ‘rescue’ and its significance for implementation of rapid response systems in acute health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 233-242.
    3. Nils Gutacker & Andrew Street, 2018. "Multidimensional performance assessment of public sector organisations using dominance criteria," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 13-27, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:23-24:p:4806-4817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.