IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i19-20p3860-3869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Involving nursing students into clinical research projects: Reliability of data and experiences of students?

Author

Listed:
  • Kjersti Sortland
  • Kristin Halvorsen
  • Jūratė Šaltytė Benth
  • Kari Almendingen

Abstract

Aims To examine reliability of the screening data collected by nursing students. Furthermore, to examine students' evaluations of participation in nutritional screening of older hospitalised patients. Background In cross‐sectional study on nutritional risk and care in older hospitalised patients, the prevalence for undernutrition was 45%, a finding corresponding with other international studies. In this study, nursing students (n = 173) screened older patients (n = 508) for malnutrition, while they were in hospital practice. The validity of the results thus depends on the quality of the students screening. Methods Agreement in measurements on age, weight, height and nutritional risk scoring by students using Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) was assessed for 30 randomly selected hospitalised patients (≥70 years), with data collected by students in the study and two additional students. Bland–Altman analysis was used for continuous measurements, while kappa statistic was used to assess agreement between the NRS 2002 scores. Experiences of all included students were described. A STROBE checklist was completed. Results No significant bias was found among the students. Questionnaire data showed that 70.5% of the students agreed that the NRS 2002 was easy to use and 59.0% found it easier to measure the patients' height than weight. It was 70.5% who found it difficult to find previously recorded information on the patients' weight in the electronic records. Only 13% found it easy to find information on patients' nutritional status. 37.0% agreed that participating in the screening was instructive, and 34.0% gained increased interest in nutritional care. Conclusion Collaborating with students in screening older patients for nutritional risk and undernutrition gave reliable data and increased the students' interest in nutritional care among hospitalised patients. Relevance to clinical practice Collaborating with students contributes with valuable data for practice and research. Moreover, it increases students' engagement for improved care practices for older patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Kjersti Sortland & Kristin Halvorsen & Jūratė Šaltytė Benth & Kari Almendingen, 2020. "Involving nursing students into clinical research projects: Reliability of data and experiences of students?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3860-3869, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:19-20:p:3860-3869
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15423
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helene Dahl Eide & Kristin Halvorsen & Kari Almendingen, 2015. "Barriers to nutritional care for the undernourished hospitalised elderly: perspectives of nurses," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 696-706, March.
    2. Helene Kjøllesdal Eide & Jūratė Šaltytė Benth & Kjersti Sortland & Kristin Halvorsen & Kari Almendingen, 2016. "Are Nutritional Care Adequate for Elderly Hospitalized Patients? A Cross-Sectional Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malene Barfod O′Connell & Pia Søe Jensen & Signe Lindgård Andersen & Cecilia Fernbrant & Vibeke Nørholm & Helle Vendel Petersen, 2018. "Stuck in tradition‐A qualitative study on barriers for implementation of evidence‐based nutritional care perceived by nursing staff," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 705-714, February.
    2. Ella Ottrey & Claire Palermo & Catherine E. Huggins & Judi Porter, 2018. "Exploring staff perceptions and experiences of volunteers and visitors on the hospital ward at mealtimes using an ethnographic approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1571-1579, April.
    3. Helene Kjøllesdal Eide & Jūratė Šaltytė Benth & Kjersti Sortland & Kristin Halvorsen & Kari Almendingen, 2016. "Are Nutritional Care Adequate for Elderly Hospitalized Patients? A Cross-Sectional Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, December.
    4. Pia Søe Jensen & Sue M Green & Janne Petersen & Ove Andersen & Ingrid Poulsen, 2018. "Perceptions and experiences of nutritional care following the overwhelming experience of lower extremity amputation: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 808-819, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:19-20:p:3860-3869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.