Author
Abstract
Aims and Objectives To evaluate the psychometric quality of two single‐item pain‐intensity measures: the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). Background Measuring pain intensity is a vital step in initiating symptom management and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions with cancer patients. Single‐item pain‐intensity measures of the NRS and VRS format have been evaluated to be acceptable for use in clinical practice and research; however, evidence to choose one over the other, as a standardised pain‐assessment format, is insufficient. Design Descriptive correlational study. The study was guided and reported following the STROBE guideline. Methods Data accrued at two time points during cancer treatment with a total of 249 patients treated in a Korean University Hospital. Two single‐item measures were constructed to assess pain intensity over 1 week. The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI; pain intensity subscale and interference subscale) and the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy‐fatigue were the criterion. Convergent and concurrent validity were tested with Pearson's correlations. Results In the convergent‐validity evaluation of the cross‐sectional association with the BPI, the NRS showed a much higher level of association than the VRS (0.81 versus 0.61). In convergent validity with a longitudinal association with the BPI, the NRS score change had a much higher level of association (0.61 versus 0.37). In concurrent‐validity evaluation, the NRS and VRS showed similar levels of associations with fatigue (−0.48 versus −0.49). Yet, the NRS showed statistically higher levels of correlation with functional limitations than the VRS (0.55 versus 0.42), comparable to the concurrent validity of the BPI. Conclusion The NRS showed higher validity than VRS when assessing overall pain intensity over the past week. Relevance to Clinical Nursing Pain assessment is a vital role of nurses in caring for patients with cancer. Current study findings support the use of the single‐item NRS pain measure to assess global pain intensity over the past week.
Suggested Citation
Hee‐Ju Kim & Sun‐Ok Jung, 2020.
"Comparative evaluations of single‐item pain‐intensity measures in cancer patients: Numeric rating scale vs. verbal rating scale,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 2945-2952, August.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:15-16:p:2945-2952
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15341
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:15-16:p:2945-2952. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.