IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i9-10p1614-1622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing evidence‐based practices on the therapeutic relationship in inpatient psychiatric care: A participatory action research

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio R. Moreno‐Poyato
  • Pilar Delgado‐Hito
  • Juan M. Leyva‐Moral
  • Georgina Casanova‐Garrigós
  • Pilar Montesó‐Curto

Abstract

Aims and objectives To produce changes in the therapeutic relationship between clinical practice nurses and patients in psychiatric units by implementing evidence‐based practices through participatory action research. Background The therapeutic relationship is the cornerstone of nursing care in psychiatric units. The literature suggests that theoretical knowledge alone is insufficient to establish the therapeutic relationship in practice. Therefore, strategies are needed to adequately establish the therapeutic relationship in psychiatric units. Design Participatory action research. Methods Participants consisted of nurses from two psychiatric units of a university hospital. Data were collected through focus groups and reflective diaries, which were analysed using the content analysis method. The COREQ guidelines were followed to ensure rigour. Results Nurses conceptualised the therapeutic relationship in their practice, identifying facilitating elements and limitations. They were able to compare their clinical practice with the recommendations of scientific evidence and constructed three evidence‐based proposals to improve the therapeutic relationship: (a) a customised nurse intervention space, (b) knowledge updating and (c) reflective groups, which they subsequently implemented and evaluated. Conclusions This study shows that nurses in psychiatric units can generate changes and improvements in the therapeutic relationship. The process of implementing evidence‐based practice enhanced participants’ awareness of their clinical practice and allowed them to make changes and improvements. Relevance to clinical practice The process confirmed that the implementation of evidence‐based practice through participatory methods, such as participatory action research, is valid and produces lasting changes. This study also reveals the need to rethink nurses’ functions and competencies in current psychiatric units.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio R. Moreno‐Poyato & Pilar Delgado‐Hito & Juan M. Leyva‐Moral & Georgina Casanova‐Garrigós & Pilar Montesó‐Curto, 2019. "Implementing evidence‐based practices on the therapeutic relationship in inpatient psychiatric care: A participatory action research," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1614-1622, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1614-1622
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14759
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14759?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angela Sweeney & Sarah Fahmy & Fiona Nolan & Nicola Morant & Zoe Fox & Brynmor Lloyd-Evans & David Osborn & Emma Burgess & Helen Gilburt & Rosemarie McCabe & Mike Slade & Sonia Johnson, 2014. "The Relationship between Therapeutic Alliance and Service User Satisfaction in Mental Health Inpatient Wards and Crisis House Alternatives: A Cross-Sectional Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joel S. Zugai & Jane Stein‐Parbury & Michael Roche, 2018. "The nature of the therapeutic alliance between nurses and consumers with Anorexia Nervosa in the inpatient setting: A mixed‐methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 416-426, January.
    2. Piat, Myra & Sofouli, Eleni & Wainwright, Megan & Albert, Hélene & Rivest, Marie-Pier & Casey, Regina & LeBlanc, Sébastien & Labonté, Lise & O’Rourke, Joseph J. & Kasdorf, Sarah, 2022. "Translating mental health recovery guidelines into recovery-oriented innovations: A strategy combining implementation teams and a facilitated planning process," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Dagmar Steinmair & Felix Richter & Henriette Löffler-Stastka, 2020. "Relationship between Mentalizing and Working Conditions in Health Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-14, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1614-1622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.