IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i9-10p1482-1490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parents’ experiences of donation to their child before kidney transplantation: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Hanne Agerskov
  • Helle Thiesson
  • Kirsten Specht
  • Birthe D. Pedersen

Abstract

Aim and objectives To explore parents’ experiences of donation to their child before kidney transplantation. Background Transplantation is the treatment of choice for paediatric patients with end‐stage renal disease. Living donor kidney transplantation has shown a higher long‐term transplant survival compared to deceased donor transplantation and entails a more controllable process, with shorter waiting time. Besides complex care and treatment of their child, parents must reflect on the prospects of being a donor for their child. However, little is known about the parent donor and parent caregiver perspective. Design A qualitative exploratory study taking a phenomenological‐hermeneutic approach. Method The study was conducted in a Danish university hospital. Interviews were conducted with the parents of seven children, aged between 5–15 years, with end‐stage renal disease in the period before kidney transplantation. Data were analysed with inspiration from Ricoeur's theory of interpretation on three levels: naïve reading, structural analysis and critical interpretation and discussion. Results The decision about donation was experienced as a matter of course and commitment. There were preferences for a kidney from a living donor, including the hope of being accepted as a donor. Being refused as a donor revealed feelings of powerlessness. However, transformation was performed into having a new role providing care and comfort to the child during the transplant process. Asking family and friends about donation could feel like crossing a line. Conclusion The prospect of donating to one's child had an impact on the well‐being of the entire family. Parents were in a vulnerable situation and in need of support, regarding both living and deceased donation. Waiting time included hopeful thoughts and reflections on a new caregiver role for the child during transplantation. Relevance to clinical practice Health professionals’ attention, engagement and dialogue are essential in order to gain extensive and varied knowledge about the individual parent's experiences and the well‐being of the entire family to provide care and support before, during and after the donation and transplantation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanne Agerskov & Helle Thiesson & Kirsten Specht & Birthe D. Pedersen, 2019. "Parents’ experiences of donation to their child before kidney transplantation: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1482-1490, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1482-1490
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14734
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanne Agerskov & Mette Spliid Ludvigsen & Claus Bistrup & Birthe D Pedersen, 2015. "Living kidney donors' experiences while undergoing evaluation for donation: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(15-16), pages 2258-2267, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanne Agerskov & Helle C. Thiesson & Birthe D. Pedersen, 2020. "The significance of relationships and dynamics in families with a child with end‐stage kidney disease: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 987-995, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:9-10:p:1482-1490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.