IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i7-8p1164-1173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring preceptorship programmes: Implications for future design

Author

Listed:
  • Louise M Taylor
  • Charlotte L Eost‐Telling
  • Annie Ellerton

Abstract

Aims and objectives To review and analyse current preceptorship programmes within NHS trusts in the North West of England. To evaluate the pedagogic rigour of the programme and suggest recommendations to inform the future design of preceptorship programmes. Background Enhancing the retention of newly qualified staff is of particular importance given that the journey from a new registrant to a competent healthcare professional poses a number of challenges, for both the individual staff member and organisations. Design A mixed methods evaluative approach was employed, using online questionnaires and content analysis of preceptorship documentation. Methods Forty‐one NHS trusts across the North West region employing newly qualified nurses were invited to participate in the completion of an online questionnaire. In addition, preceptorship programme documentation was requested for inclusion in the content analysis. This study used the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines. Results The response rate for the questionnaire was 56.1% (n = 23). Eighteen trusts (43.9%) forwarded their programme documentation. Findings highlighted the wide variation in preceptorship programmes across the geographical footprint. Conclusions There were instances of outstanding preceptorship and preceptorship programmes where there was a clear link between the strategic vision, that is, trust policy, and its delivery, that is, preceptorship offering. There was no one framework that would universally meet the needs of all trusts; yet, there are key components which should be included in all preceptorship programmes. Therefore, we would encourage innovation and creativity in preceptorship programmes, cognisant of local context. Relevance to clinical practice The significant shortage of nursing staff in England is an ongoing issue. Recruitment and retention are key to ameliorating the shortfall, and formal support mechanisms like preceptorship, can improve the retention of newly qualified staff. Understanding current preceptorship programmes is an important first step in establishing the fundamental building blocks of successful preceptorship programmes and enabling the sharing of exemplary good practice across organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise M Taylor & Charlotte L Eost‐Telling & Annie Ellerton, 2019. "Exploring preceptorship programmes: Implications for future design," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(7-8), pages 1164-1173, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:7-8:p:1164-1173
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14714
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amelia Swift & Louise Banks & Amintha Baleswaran & Nicholas Cooke & Cerys Little & Linda McGrath & Ronnie Meechan‐Rogers & Alice Neve & Helen Rees & Amy Tomlinson & Grace Williams, 2020. "COVID‐19 and student nurses: A view from England," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3111-3114, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:7-8:p:1164-1173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.