IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i5-6p980-986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ attitudes, beliefs and practices on sexuality for cardiovascular care: A cross‐sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Panpan Wang
  • Jiansai Ai
  • Patricia M. Davidson
  • Tammy Slater
  • Ruofei Du
  • Changying Chen

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe nurses’ attitudes, beliefs, and practices regarding sexuality care for patients with cardiovascular disease. Background Limited sexual activity is common among patients with cardiovascular disease, yet assessment of sexuality and counselling is frequently not undertaken by nurses. Design Cross‐sectional study. Methods This study recruited 268 cardiac nurses from seven tertiary hospitals in five cities of Henan province. The Sexual Attitudes and Beliefs Survey, along with investigator‐developed questions regarding practices and perceived barriers, was administered to the nurses. The STROBE checklist was used to ensure quality reporting during this observational study (see Supporting Information Data S1). Results The average age of nurses who participated was 31.81 years (SD = 7.41). The average score of Sexual Attitudes and Beliefs Survey was 47.72 (SD = 7.40), indicating moderate attitudinal barriers for nurses to discuss sexual activities with patients. Most nurses (91%) perceived that sexuality was too private to discuss with patients. Only 20% of nurses expressed that they would provide time to discuss sexual concerns with patients. Eighty per cent of nurses revealed that they felt uncomfortable discussing sexuality; moreover, they believed that hospitalised patients were too sick to be engaged in these types of conversations. Additionally, almost 85% of nurses conveyed that they have never conducted discussions regarding sexuality care in patients with cardiovascular disease. The most frequently reported perceived barriers preventing nurses from discussing sexual concerns included fear of offending patients (77.2%), uncertainty of how to communicate with patients (69.4%), feelings of embarrassment (67.5%), lack of safe and private environments (61.9%) and lack of knowledge (54.9%). Conclusion Nurses in this cross‐sectional sample rarely discussed sexual concerns with their patients. There were several key barriers identified by nurses regarding providing sexuality care, including personal attitudes and beliefs, limited skills and knowledge, culture and organizational‐related barriers. Relevance to clinical practice Targeted training for nurses and creating a culturally safe environment is recommended to improve management of sexuality in patients with CVD.

Suggested Citation

  • Panpan Wang & Jiansai Ai & Patricia M. Davidson & Tammy Slater & Ruofei Du & Changying Chen, 2019. "Nurses’ attitudes, beliefs and practices on sexuality for cardiovascular care: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 980-986, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:5-6:p:980-986
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14692
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14692?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:5-6:p:980-986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.