IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i5-6p947-958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Attenuating Anxieties”: A grounded theory study of mental health nurses’ responses to clients with suicidal behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Morrissey
  • Agnes Higgins

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop a grounded theory to explain mental health nurses’ responses to clients with suicidal behaviour. Background Mental health nurses are an integral part of the multi‐disciplinary teams supporting people who experience suicidal behaviour, yet limited research is available that explores how nurses respond to the needs of people at risk of suicide and what factors influence their responses and actions. Methods Grounded theory was the methodology for this study. Interviews were conducted with 33 mental health nurses working in an urban area in the Republic of Ireland. Data were analysed using the concurrent processes of comparative analysis, theoretical sampling, theoretical sensitivity and memo writing. COREQ 32‐item checklist was used. Results The core category from the data was “Attenuating Anxieties.” Participants’ main concerns about caring for suicidal clients were related to their feelings of professional and personal vulnerability and the need to protect clients and themselves. This theory “Attenuating Anxieties” highlights the way in which nurses allay their anxieties by utilising historically known risk adverse strategies to care for the suicidal person. Acquisition of further psychotherapeutic training, clinical supervision as well as increased reflexivity protected some participants and enabled them to work creatively and collaboratively while supporting and facilitating therapeutic risk‐taking. Conclusions The theory of “Attenuating Anxieties” identifies how participants worked within the context of mental health as members of the “risk society,” wherein they worried about the possibility and probability of a negative or adverse effect for both the client and self, leaving them to feel constantly vulnerable and unsafe. Relevance to clinical practice This theory highlights the need for a culture of openness that acknowledges nurses’ and organisations’ anxieties surrounding suicide and promotes a discourse among nurses that moves from a position of risk aversion to a relational and recovery‐orientated approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Morrissey & Agnes Higgins, 2019. "“Attenuating Anxieties”: A grounded theory study of mental health nurses’ responses to clients with suicidal behaviour," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 947-958, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:5-6:p:947-958
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14717
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonie Clancy & Brenda Happell, 2014. "Tensions of difference: reconciling organisational imperatives for risk management with consumer‐focused care from the perspectives of clinicians and managers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3177-3187, November.
    2. Anne‐Grethe Talseth & Fredricka L Gilje, 2011. "Nurses’ responses to suicide and suicidal patients: a critical interpretive synthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(11‐12), pages 1651-1667, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:5-6:p:947-958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.