IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i5-6p836-849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ experiences and reactions towards intimacy and sexuality expressions by nursing home residents: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Kristof Thys
  • Lieslot Mahieu
  • Alice Cavolo
  • Carolien Hensen
  • Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé
  • Chris Gastmans

Abstract

Objectives To better understand how nurses experience and react to intimate and sexual expressions of nursing home residents. Background Although many nursing home residents continue to desire intimacy and sexual expression, they commonly perceive negative attitudes of nursing staff towards them as a major barrier to their sexual well‐being. To eliminate this barrier, it is crucial to gain a more in‐depth understanding of nurses’ personal experiences and reactions towards intimacy and sexuality in aged care. Design Our study used a qualitative design, rooted in grounded theory. Methods Semi‐structured interviews with 15 nurses between 34 and 59 years of age were conducted. Participating nurses were recruited from seven different nursing homes in Flanders, Belgium. We used the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) for data analysis. We followed the COREQ guidelines to ensure rigour in our study. Results Nurses experienced and dealt with intimate and sexual expressions of residents in an individual way, which was focused on setting and respecting their own sexual boundaries and those of residents and family members. Depending on their comfort level with residents’ expressions, nurses responded in three ways: active facilitation, tolerance and termination. Nurses’ responses depended on contextual factors, including their personal experiences with sexuality, the nature of their relationship with the residents involved, the presence of dementia and the organisational culture of the facility. Conclusions Nurses face a wide range of experiences and emotions when confronted with residents’ expressions of sexuality and intimacy. A supportive approach is needed to guide nurses in dealing with these highly sensitive situations. This approach can be promoted at the institutional level through continuous educational programmes. Relevance to clinical practice This study advocates a contextual and interpretative ethical approach to sexuality in older adults, taking as starting point nurses’ own vulnerability and that of residents and relatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristof Thys & Lieslot Mahieu & Alice Cavolo & Carolien Hensen & Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé & Chris Gastmans, 2019. "Nurses’ experiences and reactions towards intimacy and sexuality expressions by nursing home residents: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 836-849, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:5-6:p:836-849
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14680
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Feliciano Villar & Rodrigo Serrat & Montserrat Celdrán & Josep Fabà, 2016. "Staff attitudes and reactions towards residents’ masturbation in Spanish long‐term care facilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 819-828, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feliciano Villar & Rodrigo Serrat & Montserrat Celdrán & Josep Fabà & Teresa Martínez & Jos Twisk, 2020. "‘I do it my way’: long-term care staff’s perceptions of residents’ sexual needs and suggestions for improvement in their management," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 197-205, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:5-6:p:836-849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.