IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i5-6p775-780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the delivery of long‐term at‐home nursing care: An example of good practice

Author

Listed:
  • Zofia Stojak
  • Jacek Jamiolkowski
  • Ludmila Marcinowicz

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the influence of long‐term at‐home nursing care (LTHNC) on patient functional status. The specific aims were as follows: (1) to analyse the influence of LTHNC on patient functional status in terms of activities of daily living; (2) to evaluate the risk of pressure sores and pressure sore prevention in patients receiving LTHNC. Background LTHNC is a form of care for chronically ill persons staying at home who do not need hospitalisation, but due to their health problems they require regular nursing care that can be provided at home. Design A retrospective descriptive study. Methods A document research method was used. We collected data from the medical records of 1,058 patients receiving LTHNC at the Non‐Public Health Care Centre OMNI‐MED in Bialystok (Poland) for the years 2005–2012. Results Detailed analysis of scores on the Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index revealed significant improvement in patient functional status as a result of LTHNC. In patients aged 65–80, the Barthel score increased by 8.83 points, and in patients aged 64 years and younger, the score increased by 6.58 points (p 80 years), functional status improved the least, gaining a mean of 4.97 points on the Barthel scale. Overall, the demonstrated improvement of patient functional status and reduced risk of pressure sore development provide evidence that LTHNC is an effective form of care for elderly and chronically ill persons staying at home. Conclusion The findings of our study represent a positive example of the way good nursing care can benefit patients while promoting the autonomous nature of nursing. Relevance to clinical practice The results add to our understanding of the functioning of LTHNC by providing relevant scientific evidence which may contribute to the development of community nursing.

Suggested Citation

  • Zofia Stojak & Jacek Jamiolkowski & Ludmila Marcinowicz, 2019. "Evaluation of the delivery of long‐term at‐home nursing care: An example of good practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 775-780, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:5-6:p:775-780
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14671
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henna Hasson & Judith E Arnetz, 2011. "Care recipients’ and family members’ perceptions of quality of older people care: a comparison of home‐based care and nursing homes," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(9‐10), pages 1423-1435, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:5-6:p:775-780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.