IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i21-22p4053-4061.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting and quantifying low‐value nursing care in clinical practice: A questionnaire survey

Author

Listed:
  • Dimelza Osorio
  • Esperanza Zuriguel‐Pérez
  • Soledad Romea‐Lecumberri
  • Montserrat Tiñena‐Amorós
  • Montserrat Martínez‐Muñoz
  • Ángeles Barba‐Flores

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the opinion of hospital nurses on a group of recommendations aimed at reducing low‐value nursing care and, based on these results, to detect low‐value practices probably existing in the hospital. Background Low‐value nursing care refers to clinical practices with poor or no benefit for patients that may be harmful and a waste of resources. Detecting these practices and understanding nurses' perceptions are essential to developing effective interventions to reduce them. Methods We conducted a survey in a tertiary hospital. STROBE guidelines were followed. The questionnaire appraised nurses' agreement, subjective adherence and perception of usefulness of a group of recommendations to reduce low‐value nursing care from Choosing Wisely and other initiatives. Practices described in recommendations with an agreement over 70% and a subjective adherence under 70% were categorised as low‐value practices probably existing in the hospital. Results A total of 265 nurses from eight areas of care participated in the survey. The response rate by area ranged between 2%–55%. From the 38 recommendations evaluated, agreement was 96% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 95%–97%), median subjective adherence was 80% (95%CI, 80%–85%), and usefulness was 90% (95%CI, 89%–92%). Based on these results, we detected seven (0–15) low‐value practices probably existing in our hospital, mostly on general practice, pregnancy care and wound care. Conclusions We found a great understanding of low‐value care between nurses, given the high agreement to recommendations and perception of usefulness. However, several low‐value practices may be present in nursing care, requiring actions to reduce them, for instance, reviewing institutional protocols and involving patients in de‐implementation. Relevance to clinical practice Hospitals and other settings should be aware of low‐value practices and take actions to identify and reduce them. A survey may be a simple and helpful way to start this process.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimelza Osorio & Esperanza Zuriguel‐Pérez & Soledad Romea‐Lecumberri & Montserrat Tiñena‐Amorós & Montserrat Martínez‐Muñoz & Ángeles Barba‐Flores, 2019. "Selecting and quantifying low‐value nursing care in clinical practice: A questionnaire survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 4053-4061, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:21-22:p:4053-4061
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14989
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeanette W Kirk & Per Nilsen, 2016. "Implementing evidence‐based practices in an emergency department: contradictions exposed when prioritising a flow culture," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 555-565, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Skovgaard, Anna Louise & Jørgensen, Marianne Johansson & Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine & Høybye, Mette Terp, 2022. "Discharge readiness as an infrastructure: Negotiating the transfer of care for elderly patients in medical wards," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    2. Jeanette W Kirk & Ditte M Sivertsen & Janne Petersen & Per Nilsen & Helle V Petersen, 2016. "Barriers and facilitators for implementing a new screening tool in an emergency department: A qualitative study applying the Theoretical Domains Framework," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2786-2797, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:21-22:p:4053-4061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.