Author
Listed:
- Siv Tove Aunan
- Gry Ciekals Wallgren
- Britt Sætre Hansen
Abstract
Aims and objectives To describe breast cancer (BC) survivors' experiences of participating in a 2‐day educational programme (Breast Cancer School, BCS) and their critical reflection on information received during and after adjuvant treatment. The following research questions guided the study. How do BC survivors experience their participation in an educational programme? How do BC survivors experience the information trajectory during and after adjuvant treatment? Background BC is the most prevalent cancer among women in Norway. BC survivors have a substantial need for information about the disease, treatment and recovery. During the past few years, BC treatment in Norway has changed from inpatient‐ to outpatient‐based treatment. Oncology nurses and oncologists are obliged to provide patients and their families with information, which has necessitated reorganisation of the procedures for providing information. New arenas such as the Breast Cancer School (BCS) offer the opportunity to learn from experts and fellow patients. Design Qualitative, descriptive design. Methods Focus groups with 20 BC survivors after having participated in the BCS were used to enable critical reflection. The COREQ checklist was followed to ensure rigour in the study. Results Two themes emerged from qualitative analysis: Balancing between the need for and the fear of information and Moving from a safe structure to lonely recovery. We identified differences between BC survivors in diversity, uniqueness and need for information. Continuity and expert knowledge provided by a primary oncology nurse and oncologists were highlighted as important. Conclusion The study reveals the need for information tailored to each BC survivor's unique needs. The BC survivors expressed both the need for and the fear of information. BCS takes both a systematic and individual approach to provide expert information, dialog and the opportunity to meet with fellow patients. The transition from the structure of the treatment to lonely recovery after the most intensive treatment was perceived as unsafe and challenging. BC patients' experiences must be continuously valued and used to improve educational programmes, care and treatment. Oncology nurses play an important part in the information chain and continuity. Relevance to clinical practice This study highlights the importance of including BC survivors in the design and evaluation of educational programmes. The provision of information and supportive care with continuity between oncology nurses and oncologists through the trajectory of treatment and care is crucial.
Suggested Citation
Siv Tove Aunan & Gry Ciekals Wallgren & Britt Sætre Hansen, 2019.
"Breast cancer survivors' experiences of dealing with information during and after adjuvant treatment: A qualitative study,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 3012-3020, August.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:3012-3020
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14700
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Sotiria Koutsopoulou & Elizabeth DE Papathanassoglou & Maria C Katapodi & Elisabeth I Patiraki, 2010.
"A critical review of the evidence for nurses as information providers to cancer patients,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(5‐6), pages 749-765, March.
- Lauretta Luck & Harrison Ng Chok & Nancy Scott & Lesley Wilkes, 2017.
"The role of the breast care nurse in patient and family care,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(21-22), pages 3422-3429, November.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:15-16:p:3012-3020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.