IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i13-14p2517-2525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of the Champions for Skin Integrity model to improve leg and foot ulcer care in the primary healthcare setting

Author

Listed:
  • Chrisina N. Parker
  • Patricia Shuter
  • Diane Maresco‐Pennisi
  • Jodie Sargent
  • Lou Collins
  • Helen E. Edwards
  • Kathleen J. Finlayson

Abstract

Aims To facilitate evidence‐based leg and foot ulcer management through implementation of the Champions for Skin Integrity model to education in primary health care in Australia. Background Leg and foot ulcers are frequently seen wounds in general practice and wound care the most frequently performed activity by practice nurses. The literature reports the lack of evidence‐based leg and foot ulcer assessment, management and prevention strategies in this setting, and previous research in regard to confidence and knowledge has indicated that general practice health professionals have the greatest need for education in wound care. Design Pre–post, nonequivalent group research design. Methods The Champions for Skin Integrity model of evidence‐based wound management utilised strategies including workshops, development of Champions and use of resources. Pre‐ and post‐implementation health professional surveys and patient clinical audits were completed. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables. Paired t tests identified statistically significant differences between the pre/post staff survey data. STROBE guidelines for reporting were followed (See Appendix S1). Results One hundred nine general practice healthcare professional staff attended the workshops. Significant outcomes were noted in increased levels of confidence in ability to assess, manage and prevent all types of leg and foot ulcers, as well as to apply evidence‐based practice and change management following workshops. Pre‐ and post‐skin audits also indicated an increase in evidence‐based practices. Conclusion Implementation of Champions for Skin Integrity strategies in this sample of primary healthcare professionals in general practice fostered a positive change in evidence‐based wound management, assessment and prevention. Relevance to clinical practice The Champions for Skin Integrity model has supported increases in evidence‐based practices in treatment and management of wounds in primary healthcare professionals, similar to the positive outcomes gained in the aged care setting. This is likely to lead to positive outcomes for those with wounds in this setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Chrisina N. Parker & Patricia Shuter & Diane Maresco‐Pennisi & Jodie Sargent & Lou Collins & Helen E. Edwards & Kathleen J. Finlayson, 2019. "Implementation of the Champions for Skin Integrity model to improve leg and foot ulcer care in the primary healthcare setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2517-2525, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2517-2525
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14826
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helen E. Edwards & Anne M. Chang & Michelle Gibb & Kathleen J. Finlayson & Christina Parker & Maria O'Reilly & Jan McDowell & Patricia Shuter, 2017. "Reduced prevalence and severity of wounds following implementation of the Champions for Skin Integrity model to facilitate uptake of evidence‐based practice in aged care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4276-4285, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2517-2525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.