IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i13-14p2499-2505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical evaluation of the multifunctional suprapubic catheter in patients requiring permanent suprapubic cystostomy: A prospective randomised trial in a single centre

Author

Listed:
  • Hai‐Jing Dong
  • Yi Lu
  • Nian‐Zhao Zhang
  • Wen‐Hua Zhang
  • Shuai Wu
  • Hui Zhao
  • Chang‐Cun Zhang
  • Si‐Chuan Hou

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess the clinical effect of the multifunctional suprapubic catheter (MSC) on occurrence of cystospasm, catheter occlusion, the catheter‐related urinary tract infection and remission of overactivity bladder, by comparing with the conventional suprapubic catheter (CSC) in patients with permanent suprapubic cystostomy. Background The conventional suprapubic catheter usually presents with high incidence of catheter‐associated complications. Design A prospective randomised clinical trial in a single centre. Methods Between January 2014 and January 2015, a total of 91 consecutive patients with permanent suprapubic cystostomy were prospectively randomised into two groups: the MSC group (n = 43) and CSC group (n = 48). Results Our results showed that the total times of cystospasm in the MSC group were significantly less than that in the CSC group during the follow‐up time (p

Suggested Citation

  • Hai‐Jing Dong & Yi Lu & Nian‐Zhao Zhang & Wen‐Hua Zhang & Shuai Wu & Hui Zhao & Chang‐Cun Zhang & Si‐Chuan Hou, 2019. "Clinical evaluation of the multifunctional suprapubic catheter in patients requiring permanent suprapubic cystostomy: A prospective randomised trial in a single centre," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2499-2505, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2499-2505
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14208
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2499-2505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.