IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i13-14p2386-2400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes and needs of residents in long‐term care facilities regarding physical activity—A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies

Author

Listed:
  • Carola Maurer
  • Sever Draganescu
  • Hanna Mayer
  • Heidrun Gattinger

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify the attitudes and needs of nursing home residents regarding physical activity. Background Nursing home residents often have mobility problems and are at high risk for further mobility impairment. From their point of view, being physically active is an important part of their perceived quality of life. However, no study has synthesised existing qualitative literature on residents’ attitudes and needs regarding physical activity. Design Synthesis of qualitative studies. Methods A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies was performed, using ENTREQ statement for reporting. Three databases (PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO) were searched, supplemented by a hand search. Qualitative studies published in English or German were included if they addressed the attitudes and needs of residents concerning the promotion of physical activities. Finally, 12 studies were critically reviewed, and a thematic synthesis was conducted. Results Four analytical themes relating to residents’ attitudes were identified: “promoting physical activity increases the quality of life,” “accepting the conditions,” “personal initiative is significant” and “promoting physical activity is not helpful.” Relating to residents’ needs, the analyses yielded five themes: “living autonomously,” “continuing life as before,” “competent care,” “individually adapted programme and support,” and “barrier‐free accessibility.” Conclusion Nursing home residents have different attitudes and needs regarding being physically active. It is important to perceive these attitudes and needs of each resident and to offer an individually adapted programme and support. Further research should consider motivational strategies for residents who are not very much familiar with being physically active and offer exercise programmes with individual parts to address residents’ preferences. Relevance to clinical practice To motivate and activate residents, institutions should be aware of residents’ individual attitudes and needs regarding physical activity. Further development of interventions concerning mobility promotion activities and their implementation in long‐term care settings should consider the outlined factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Carola Maurer & Sever Draganescu & Hanna Mayer & Heidrun Gattinger, 2019. "Attitudes and needs of residents in long‐term care facilities regarding physical activity—A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2386-2400, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2386-2400
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14761
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14761?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuh‐Min Chen, 2010. "Perceived barriers to physical activity among older adults residing in long‐term care institutions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3‐4), pages 432-439, February.
    2. Hyun Ju Kim & Jung Eun Choi & Mi So Kim & Su Jin Kim & Sung Ok Chang, 2016. "Nurses’ clinical decision‐making for preserving nursing home residents’ remaining abilities," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(9-10), pages 1326-1335, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Angélique Herrler & Helena Kukla & Vera Vennedey & Stephanie Stock, 2022. "What matters to people aged 80 and over regarding ambulatory care? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 325-339, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiabin Yu & Chen Yang & Xiaoguang Zhao & Zhexiao Zhou & Shen Zhang & Diankai Zhai & Jianshe Li, 2021. "The Associations of Built Environment with Older People Recreational Walking and Physical Activity in a Chinese Small-Scale City of Yiwu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Abdulwali Sabo & Yee Cheng Kueh & Garry Kuan, 2019. "Psychometric properties of the Malay version of the self-efficacy for exercise scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Sung Ok Chang & Su Jung Lee & Min Sun Park & Young Lim Choi & Geun Myun Kim, 2020. "Conceptualizations of function‐focused care used by practitioners in Korean nursing homes," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 988-999, December.
    4. Sonia Chaabane & Karima Chaabna & Sathyanarayanan Doraiswamy & Ravinder Mamtani & Sohaila Cheema, 2021. "Barriers and Facilitators Associated with Physical Activity in the Middle East and North Africa Region: A Systematic Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2386-2400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.