IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i13-14p2369-2385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The experience of person‐centred practice in a 100% single‐room environment in acute care settings—A narrative literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Rosemary Kelly
  • Donna Brown
  • Tanya McCance
  • Christine Boomer

Abstract

Aims and objectives To review published research into the staff and adult patient experience of person‐centred practice in a 100% single‐room environment in acute care. Background There has been a significant move towards the 100% single‐room environment within healthcare systems. Furthermore, there has been a global move for developing person‐centred practice in a range of healthcare settings. Some studies have linked the role of the physical environment to patient outcomes and improved patient satisfaction; however, these are limited. Overall, there is little evidence in the international literature of the experience of care in single rooms in adult, acute care settings. Design A narrative description was developed using the major constructs of the person‐centred practice framework (PcPF). The PRISMA checklist provided additional rigour. Method Problems, Exposure, Outcomes (PEO) refined the search terms to: person‐centred, adult acute care, single room, staff experience and patient experience. CINAHL, Medline Ovid, Psycinfo, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for full‐text English language papers of empirical studies published between 2012–2017. PRISMA illustrated final paper determination, and the CASP/EPHPP frameworks were used for a critical appraisal of the 12 selected papers. Results The literature recognises the increasing complexity of health care in the acute care environment globally. The international literature available identifies staffs’ desire to practise person‐centredness, but much of the evidence is focused on care delivery. The impact of the single‐room environment on person‐centred practice links mainly to the constructs of the care environment and person‐centred processes within the PcPF. Conclusion This review focuses on empirical studies relating to person‐centred practice in the single‐room environment published in the last 5 years. While there is a significant body of work relating to person‐centredness and the delivery of person‐centred practice, and the impact of the environment on care delivery, there appears to limited evidence linking person‐centred practice, staff and patient experience and the single‐room environment. Relevance to clinical practice By understanding the context in which care is delivered, multiprofessional teams can explore how the delivery of person‐centred practice may be influenced by the physical environment and what changes to culture, systems and processes may be required to enhance the experience of care for patients and the delivery of care for staff.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosemary Kelly & Donna Brown & Tanya McCance & Christine Boomer, 2019. "The experience of person‐centred practice in a 100% single‐room environment in acute care settings—A narrative literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2369-2385, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2369-2385
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14729
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:13-14:p:2369-2385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.