IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i11-12p2309-2318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The use of a screening scale improves the recognition of delirium in older patients after cardiac surgery—A retrospective observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Smulter
  • Helena Claesson Lingehall
  • Yngve Gustafson
  • Birgitta Olofsson
  • Karl Gunnar Engström

Abstract

Aims and objectives To analyse postoperative delirium (POD) in clinical practice after cardiac surgery, how it is detected and documented and if the use of a screening scale improves the detection rate. Background Cardiac surgery is considered a routine procedure with few complications. However, POD remains a concern, although often being overlooked in clinical practice. Design Retrospective observational analysis. Methods Patients 70 years and older with POD (n = 78) undergoing cardiac surgery were included in the study. Discharge summaries of both nurses and physicians were reviewed together with the clinical database for information about POD, to be compared with symptom screening using the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu‐DESC). A quantitative content analysis was used for the review of discharge summaries, with a coding scheme adopted from the Nu‐DESC method. The STROBE checklist was followed. Results In discharge summaries, 41 of the 78 POD patients were correctly recognised, and 22 of these were identified in the clinical database. Screening by the Nu‐DESC identified delirium at a measurably higher rate, 56/78 patients. The review of discharge summaries showed that patients expressing "inappropriate behaviour" was the most easily identified sign for POD for both nurses and physicians. Conclusions Healthcare professionals underdiagnose delirium after cardiac surgery, with a low detection rate described in both discharge summaries and in the clinical database. Recognition of delirium improved when Nu‐DESC was used for systematic screening. Relevance to clinical practice This study emphasises the need for better screening for the detection of delirium in daily clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Smulter & Helena Claesson Lingehall & Yngve Gustafson & Birgitta Olofsson & Karl Gunnar Engström, 2019. "The use of a screening scale improves the recognition of delirium in older patients after cardiac surgery—A retrospective observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2309-2318, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2309-2318
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14838
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14838?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helena Claesson Lingehall & Nina Smulter & Karl Gunnar Engström & Yngve Gustafson & Birgitta Olofsson, 2013. "Validation of the Swedish version of the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale used in patients 70 years and older undergoing cardiac surgery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(19-20), pages 2858-2866, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2309-2318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.