IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i11-12p2197-2205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adherence assessment practices in haemodialysis settings: A qualitative exploration of nurses and pharmacists' perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Saurav Ghimire
  • Kenneth Lee
  • Matthew D. Jose
  • Ronald L. Castelino
  • Syed Tabish R. Zaidi

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore clinician assessment of patient adherence and identify strategies to improve adherence assessment practices in haemodialysis settings. Background Patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis are typically prescribed complex regimens; as such, they are at high risk of medication nonadherence. Current clinical practices focus on prescribing medications; however, little attention is paid to measuring and ensuring patient adherence to their prescribed treatments. Design A qualitative study. Methods Semi‐structured individual interviews were conducted in November and December 2016, with 12 nurses and 6 pharmacists, working in Australian haemodialysis settings. The study was conducted and reported in accordance with COREQ guidelines. Results Participants were 25–60 years old and had 1–27 years of experience in dialysis. Seven themes related to assessing adherence were identified: prioritisation of resources, interplay between workload and available time, awareness of formalised adherence measures and training deficits, concerns about practicality/suitability of adherence measures, communication of assessment services, patient participation and trust. Three themes related to strategies for improving adherence assessment practices were identified: formalisation of adherence assessment process, integration of assessment processes and tools into routine, and use of multidisciplinary support to assess and promote adherence. Conclusions Current adherence assessment practices could be improved through formalisation and integration of the assessment process into dialysis unit policy/procedures. Additionally, as barriers to assessing adherence were identified at organisational, professional and patient levels, there is a need to address barriers from each level in order to improve adherence assessment practices in haemodialysis settings. Relevance to clinical practice This qualitative study highlights the challenges and practical ways by which adherence assessment practices could be improved in haemodialysis settings. This would encourage renal clinicians to actively participate in adherence assessment and promotion activities to ensure patients benefit from their therapies.

Suggested Citation

  • Saurav Ghimire & Kenneth Lee & Matthew D. Jose & Ronald L. Castelino & Syed Tabish R. Zaidi, 2019. "Adherence assessment practices in haemodialysis settings: A qualitative exploration of nurses and pharmacists' perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(11-12), pages 2197-2205, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2197-2205
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14821
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14821?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:11-12:p:2197-2205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.