IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i1-2p80-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical handover practices among healthcare practitioners in acute care services: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Gerard Fealy
  • Suzanne Donnelly
  • Gerardine Doyle
  • Maria Brenner
  • Mary Hughes
  • Elaine Mylotte
  • Emma Nicholson
  • Marina Zaki

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine clinical handover practices in acute care services in Ireland. Objectives were to examine clinical handover practices between and within teams and between shifts, to identify resources and supports to enhance handover effectiveness and to identify barriers and facilitators of effective handover. Background Clinical handover is a high‐risk activity, and ineffective handover practice constitutes a risk to patient safety. Evidence suggests that handover effectiveness is achieved through staff training and standardised handover protocols. Design The study design was qualitative‐descriptive using inductive analysis. Methods The study involved a series of focus group discussions and interviews among a sample of healthcare practitioners recruited from 12 urban and regional acute hospitals in Ireland. A total of 116 healthcare professionals took part in 28 interviews and 13 focus group discussions. We analysed the data using the directed content analysis method. Results Data collection generated rich qualitative data, yielding five categories from which two broad themes emerged: “policy and practice” and “handover effectiveness.” The themes and their associated categories indicate that there is limited organisational‐level policy and limited explicit training in clinical handover, that medical and nursing handovers are separate activities with somewhat different purposes and different modes of execution, and that several factors in the acute care setting, including location, timing and documentation, act as either barriers or enablers to handover effectiveness. Conclusion The evidence in the current study suggests that clinical handover merits increased level of prominence in hospital policies or operating procedures. Medical and nursing handover practices represent distinct activities in their content and execution that may be related to cultural and organisational factors. Relevance to clinical practice Achieving multidisciplinary team handover requires a change in embedded traditional practices. Several aspects of the clinical handover activities of nursing and medical staff appear to diverge from best‐practice evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerard Fealy & Suzanne Donnelly & Gerardine Doyle & Maria Brenner & Mary Hughes & Elaine Mylotte & Emma Nicholson & Marina Zaki, 2019. "Clinical handover practices among healthcare practitioners in acute care services: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 80-88, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:1-2:p:80-88
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14643
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14643?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Sharit & Lorgia McCane & Deborah M. Thevenin & Paul Barach, 2008. "Examining Links Between Sign‐Out Reporting During Shift Changeovers and Patient Management Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 969-981, August.
    2. Patrik Rytterström & Mitra Unosson & Maria Arman, 2011. "The significance of routines in nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(23‐24), pages 3513-3522, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristiana Ludlow & Kate Churruca & Louise A. Ellis & Virginia Mumford & Jeffrey Braithwaite, 2020. "Family members' prioritisation of care in residential aged care facilities: A case for individualised care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3272-3285, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:1-2:p:80-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.