IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v28y2019i1-2p104-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The common meanings and shared practices of sedation assessment in the context of managing patients with an opioid: A phenomenological study

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle R. Dunwoody
  • Carla R. Jungquist
  • Yu‐Ping Chang
  • Suzanne S. Dickerson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the common meanings of opioid‐induced sedation and shared practices in the context of post‐operative pain management in expert Post‐Anesthesia Care Unit nurses during patient's pain management with opioids. Background Within the clinical setting, linear pain and sedation scales are not enough to support clinical judgement with acute pain management. Because sedation measurement rests along a fluctuating continuum, it is possible for a patient to be sedated and then shift to increasing alertness, and then to drift back to a sedated state. This potential for acute clinical transition can be challenging to nurses of all levels, even for expert nurses. Design Interpretive phenomenology. Methods Twenty expert Post‐Anesthetic Care Unit nurses, with more than 7 years of nursing experience, participated in qualitative interviews regarding their lived experiences. Interviews were analysed using a modified seven‐stage process for interpretation by Diekelmann, Allen and Tanner. The manuscript was developed utilising the COREQ guidelines for reporting qualitative studies. Results Four themes identified through the participant's stories were recognising every patient is different, engaging in iterative knowing, walking a fine line, and looking beyond and anticipating. This study identified a constitutive pattern of interpreting sedation by integrating practical understanding and anticipating beyond. Conclusions This study indicates a deeper complexity in the way opioid‐induced sedation is assessed and balanced with pain management by nurses in the Post‐Anesthetic Care Unit. Relevance to practice Nurses in the study adapted their practices around pain management with opioids, in response to their patient's level of sedation; incorporating practices such as giving small, incremental doses and changing the drug. Nurses valued the importance of having “eyeballs on everybody” and being ready to meet the needs of their patient. They appreciate the time to watch and wait for their patient to respond, to better judge the result of their interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle R. Dunwoody & Carla R. Jungquist & Yu‐Ping Chang & Suzanne S. Dickerson, 2019. "The common meanings and shared practices of sedation assessment in the context of managing patients with an opioid: A phenomenological study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 104-115, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:1-2:p:104-115
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14672
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:28:y:2019:i:1-2:p:104-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.