Author
Abstract
Aims and objectives To identify the issues surrounding medication error reporting in community nursing and improvement strategies related to medication safety. Background Medication‐related problems have been identified from various sources in the literature. Examples of these include incident reporting by healthcare professionals, medico‐legal and patient complaints and systematic identification of organisational structure. Only a few studies report on the clinicians’ perceptions of medication safety in community nursing and the challenges they face within their workplace to implement medication safety initiatives. Design Qualitative design, using conversation‐style interviews with experienced registered nurses in primary care roles. Methods Using a general iterative approach of semantic analysis, our qualitative research study was guided by an essentialist paradigm. Our method for understanding included semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with 10 clinicians from a large community care organisation in rural Victoria in Australia. We developed an interview guide, which included open‐ended questions on clinicians’ experiences, perceived barriers and facilitators, and strategies to improve medication safety. Results Several barriers have been identified by healthcare practitioners that hinder medication safety in primary care including culture differences between community and hospital setting, politics within the healthcare system, lack of clarity around the nurses’ roles and lack of error reporting. Other sources of errors cited by the participants were the lack of clarity or awareness of the processes and procedures of medication incidents reporting for staff within the organisation experience. Lack of education regarding medication safety, the dilemmas associated with reporting and documentation are also significant barriers.
Suggested Citation
Hanan Khalil & Sarah Lee, 2018.
"Medication safety challenges in primary care: Nurses’ perspective,"
Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 2072-2082, May.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:2072-2082
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14353
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:9-10:p:2072-2082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.