IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i7-8pe1462-e1476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the research culture of nurses and allied health professionals (AHPs) in a research‐focused and a non‐research‐focused healthcare organisation in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Manju Luckson
  • Fiona Duncan
  • Azita Rajai
  • Carol Haigh

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the research culture of nurses and allied health professionals (AHPs) in the UK and the influence of a dedicated research strategy and funding. It is important to understand the culture in order to effectively promote evidence‐based patient care. The primary aim of this research was to explore the influence of research‐focused exposure on the research culture of nurses and AHPs in the UK and to identify whether there was a difference in the research culture between a research‐focused and non‐research‐focused clinical area (City and Riverside Hospitals). Background This is a unique and novel study that explored and compared the research culture stance of both AHPs and nurses. Design: Methods A mixed methods design was used in this study. Tools used included the “Research Capacity and Culture tool” as an online survey, three focus group discussions and five semi‐structured interviews with senior managers. Focus groups included research‐naive groups from both hospitals and a research‐active group from City Hospital. Results There were 224 responses received from 941 surveys with a 24% response rate. Descriptive statistics of the survey results indicated that there was a difference (p = .001) in the mean score of the research culture between City Hospital (5.35) and Riverside Hospital (3.90), but not between nurses and AHPs (p = .12). Qualitative data findings from the framework analysis were congruent and supported the survey results. The results provided empirical evidence to support a whole‐level approach in order to improve the research culture. Both findings showed that there may not be any difference in the research culture between professional groups. Importantly, new evidence is presented to suggest that there were crucial communication issues which were hampering the research culture and there was a lack of support at the middle management level which needed to be tackled to improve the research culture of nurses and AHPs. Relevance to clinical practice The study highlighted the need to include a whole‐level approach in organisation to improve research culture and to include communication within the Cooke's framework if evidence‐based practice is to influence the quality of patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Manju Luckson & Fiona Duncan & Azita Rajai & Carol Haigh, 2018. "Exploring the research culture of nurses and allied health professionals (AHPs) in a research‐focused and a non‐research‐focused healthcare organisation in the UK," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1462-1476, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1462-e1476
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trostle, James, 1992. "Research capacity building in international health: Definitions, evaluations and strategies for success," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1321-1324, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. King, Gillian & Currie, Melissa & Smith, Linda & Servais, Michelle & McDougall, Janette, 2008. "A framework of operating models for interdisciplinary research programs in clinical service organizations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 160-173, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:e1462-e1476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.