IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i7-8p1673-1683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives of patients with non‐insulin‐treated type 2 diabetes on self‐monitoring of blood glucose: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Chen‐Mei Chen
  • Li‐Chen Hung
  • Yang‐Lin Chen
  • Mei Chang Yeh

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore experiences of self‐monitoring of blood glucose among patients with non‐insulin‐treated type 2 diabetes. Background Self‐monitoring of blood glucose is essential to diabetes care and facilitates glycaemic control. Patients’ perspectives of self‐monitoring of blood glucose have seldom been discussed in the literature, and engagement in self‐monitoring of blood glucose is consistently low. Design The descriptive phenomenological method was used. Methods Purposive sampling was conducted to recruit participants from the endocrinology departments of medical institutions in Taiwan based on the following criteria: (i) having a medical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, (ii) not being treated with insulin, (iii) having engaged in self‐monitoring of blood glucose at least once within the preceding 6 months, (iv) being at least 20 years old and (v) not having any major mental or cognitive disorders. Data were collected in outpatient consultation rooms, the participants’ homes and other settings where the participants felt secure and comfortable. In‐depth interviews were conducted to collect data from 16 patients with diabetes. Results The participants perceived that lifestyle affected blood glucose levels and did not know how to handle high or low blood glucose levels. Their willingness to continue self‐monitoring of blood glucose depended on whether healthcare professionals checked or discussed their blood glucose levels with them. Conclusions The patients’ knowledge regarding blood glucose variation and healthcare professionals’ attitudes affected the patients’ self‐monitoring of blood glucose behaviours. The empirical findings illustrated self‐monitoring of blood glucose experiences and recommended that healthcare professionals’ closely attend to patients’ requirements and responses to diabetes and incorporate the self‐monitoring of blood glucose into therapy plans. Relevance to clinical practice Healthcare professionals should reinforce patients’ knowledge on appropriate responses to high and low blood glucose levels, intervene appropriately, discuss self‐monitoring of blood glucose results with patients and track these results.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen‐Mei Chen & Li‐Chen Hung & Yang‐Lin Chen & Mei Chang Yeh, 2018. "Perspectives of patients with non‐insulin‐treated type 2 diabetes on self‐monitoring of blood glucose: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1673-1683, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:1673-1683
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14227
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14227?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen‐Mei Chen & Mei Chang Yeh, 2015. "The experiences of diabetics on self‐monitoring of blood glucose: a qualitative metasynthesis," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 614-626, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laurel A. Despins & Bonnie J. Wakefield, 2020. "Making sense of blood glucose data and self‐management in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2572-2588, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:1673-1683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.