IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i7-8p1581-1588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in the dysphagia and nutritional status of patients with brain injury

Author

Listed:
  • Hyeyeoung Kim
  • Yeonok Suh

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate the degree of improvement in the dysphagia and nutritional status of patients with brain injuries after removal of the nasogastric tube. Background The nurse should assess patients’ dysphagia, after removal of the nasogastric tube, and immediately reflect the changes in patient care. Accordingly, the critical roles of nurses in caring for patients with dysphagia involve providing appropriate nutritional therapy as well as preventing aspiration pneumonia and nutritional imbalance. Assessment of the patient's dysphagia on a regular basis and analysis of nutritional status according to the degree of dysphagia are necessary to determine the appropriate timing for providing nursing interventions and to develop protocols for the provision of a therapeutic diet. Design Prospective observational study. Methods This study was conducted on 56 patients with dysphagia after a brain injury. Data were collected using the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) test and Swallowing Symptom Questionnaire (SSQ). Descriptive statistics, chi‐square tests, t tests, and MANOVA were analysed using SPSS 22.0. Results Patient's dysphagia was observed over the course of 2 weeks. After 14 days, the severity of dysphagia decreased from 91.1%–35.7%, while the number of participants with normal swallowing increased from 1.8%–58.9%. Dysphagia in patients with brain injury improved gradually over time. A significant difference was observed in the serum albumin level of patients with dysphagia (F = 9.51, p = .003, Wilk's λ = .034). Conclusions Most of the patients with brain injury developed moderate dysphagia immediately after removal of the nasogastric tube. However, after 14 days had elapsed, the percentage of patients recovering from dysphagia increased to 58.9%. Proper dietary patterns were not adequately provided depending on the degree of patient's dysphagia after removal of the nasogastric tube. Assessing the degree of dysphagia using the GUSS test and providing appropriate diet prevent malnutrition in patients with dysphagia. Relevance to clinical practice This study was conducted in patients who developed complications of dysphagia after a brain injury. Using the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) test, the changes in the degree of dysphagia were repeatedly measured at different times: 4, 7 and 14 days after the removal of the nasogastric tube. Provision of appropriate diet and changes in the nutritional status were analysed to determine the proper timing for nursing intervention in patients with dysphagia. The data obtained from this study could serve as a basis for developing diet provision protocols for patients with dysphagia.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyeyeoung Kim & Yeonok Suh, 2018. "Changes in the dysphagia and nutritional status of patients with brain injury," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1581-1588, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:1581-1588
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14226
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14226?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:1581-1588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.