IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i7-8p1497-1506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coping with interruptions in clinical nursing—A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Sussie Laustsen
  • Liselotte Brahe

Abstract

Aims and objectives To gain knowledge on how nurses’ cope with interruptions in clinical practice. Background Interruptions may delay work routines and result in wasted time, disorganised planning and ineffective working procedures, affecting nurses’ focus and overview in different ways. Research has identified a growing problem linking errors or adverse events with interruptions. It may affect patient safety if nurses are not paying attention to interruptions. Little is known about how nurses cope with interruptions Design The study was inspired by ethnographic fieldwork with a hermeneutical phenomenological approach. Methods Observations were performed combined with semi‐structured qualitative interviews. Results Managing interruptions depend on level of competence, working environment, dialogue and matching of expectations, collegial roles and implicit rules. Working procedures impact on how nurses are exposed to unnecessary interruptions. The latter affects overview and the ability to put the foot down and decline being interrupted. Professional competencies for example prioritising, keeping focus and collaborating across disciplines are needed to cope with interruptions. Conclusion Culture work and matching of expectations are important to reflect on and discuss personal‐ and group behaviour caused by interruptions. We need to focus on the role of each nurse in the professional team, types of personality and unspoken rules. Professional competencies for example prioritising, keeping focus and cooperating across disciplines are needed to cope with interruptions. Relevance to clinical practice Coping with interruptions is important for the nursing profession, quality of care and patient safety. Changing practice requires multidisciplinary cooperation accepting different agendas at personal, group and organisational levels. Nurses must understand the meaning and nature of different types of interruptions to develop coping strategies and maintain quality in care and patient safety in multidisciplinary teamwork.

Suggested Citation

  • Sussie Laustsen & Liselotte Brahe, 2018. "Coping with interruptions in clinical nursing—A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1497-1506, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:1497-1506
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14288
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik E Sørensen & Liselotte Brahe, 2014. "Interruptions in clinical nursing practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1274-1282, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehammed Adem Getnet & Berhanu Boru Bifftu, 2017. "Work Interruption Experienced by Nurses during Medication Administration Process and Associated Factors, Northwest Ethiopia," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-7, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:7-8:p:1497-1506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.