IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i5-6pe820-e832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of clinical pathway‐directed care on hospitalisation‐related outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A quasi‐experimental study

Author

Listed:
  • Warda Ramadan Abouzeid Mohamed
  • Matthew J. Leach
  • Nagwa Ahmad Reda
  • Mohammad Mohamed Abd‐Ellatif
  • Mona Aly Mohammed
  • Mervat Anwar Abd‐Elaziz

Abstract

Aims and objectives To compare the effectiveness of clinical pathway‐directed care to usual care on hospitalisation‐related outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (STBI). Background Severe traumatic brain injury is a major cause of disability and mortality in young adults. Clinical pathways endeavour to bring evidence and clinical practice closer together to foster the delivery of best practice and to improve patient outcomes. Design Quasi‐experimental study. Methods The study was conducted in a trauma intensive care unit of a large teaching hospital in Egypt. Patients aged 18–60 years with a diagnosis of STBI, a Glasgow Coma Scale score between 3–8 and a nonpenetrating head injury were consecutively assigned to 15 days of care. The outcomes assessed were complications related to hospitalisation, clinical variances, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, ICU readmission rate and patient/family satisfaction. Results Sixty participants completed the study (30 in each arm). Apart from age, there were no significant differences between groups in baseline characteristics. The clinical pathway group demonstrated statistically significantly fewer cases of hospitalisation‐related complications on day 15, and a significantly shorter length of ICU stay, lower ICU readmission rate and a high level of patient/family satisfaction when compared with the usual care group. The effect of the intervention on fever, pressure ulceration, hyperglycaemia and readmission to the ICU was no longer statistically significant after controlling for age. Conclusions The findings of the current study suggest that the implementation of a clinical pathway for patients with severe TBI may be helpful in improving the patient experience as well as some hospitalisation‐related outcomes. Relevance to clinical practice The provision of clinical pathway‐directed care in a trauma ICU may offer benefits to the patient, family and institution beyond that provided by usual care.

Suggested Citation

  • Warda Ramadan Abouzeid Mohamed & Matthew J. Leach & Nagwa Ahmad Reda & Mohammad Mohamed Abd‐Ellatif & Mona Aly Mohammed & Mervat Anwar Abd‐Elaziz, 2018. "The effectiveness of clinical pathway‐directed care on hospitalisation‐related outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A quasi‐experimental study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 820-832, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e820-e832
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14194
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manju Dhandapani & Sivashanmugam Dhandapani & Meena Agarwal & Ashok K Mahapatra, 2014. "Pressure ulcer in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: significant factors and association with neurological outcome," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(7-8), pages 1114-1119, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeong Eun Yoon & Ok-Hee Cho, 2022. "Risk Factors Associated With Pressure Ulcers in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(4), pages 648-655, May.
    2. Sirpa Mäki‐Turja‐Rostedt & Minna Stolt & Helena Leino‐Kilpi & Elina Haavisto, 2019. "Preventive interventions for pressure ulcers in long‐term older people care facilities: A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(13-14), pages 2420-2442, July.
    3. Marianne Brostrup Sachs & Mia Moth Wolffbrandt & Ingrid Poulsen, 2018. "Prevention of pressure ulcers in patients undergoing subacute rehabilitation after severe brain injury: An observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2776-2784, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e820-e832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.