IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i5-6pe1233-e1241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A social–ecological framework: A model for addressing ethical practice in nursing

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Davidson
  • Cynda Hylton Rushton
  • Melissa Kurtz
  • Brian Wise
  • Debra Jackson
  • Adam Beaman
  • Marion Broome

Abstract

Aims and objectives To develop a framework to enable discussion, debate and the formulation of interventions to address ethical issues in nursing practice. Background Social, cultural, political and economic drivers are rapidly changing the landscape of health care in our local environments but also in a global context. Increasingly, nurses are faced with a range of ethical dilemmas in their work. This requires investigation into the culture of healthcare systems and organisations to identify the root causes and address the barriers and enablers of ethical practice. The increased medicalisation of health care; pressures for systemisation; efficiency and cost reduction; and an ageing population contribute to this complexity. Often, ethical issues in nursing are considered within the abstract and philosophical realm until a dilemma is encountered. Such an approach limits the capacity to tangibly embrace ethical values and frameworks as pathways to equitable, accessible, safe and quality health care and as a foundation for strengthening a supportive and enabling workplace for nurses and other healthcare workers. Design Conceptual framework development. Methods A comprehensive literature review was undertaken using the social–ecological framework as an organising construct. Results This framework views ethical practice as the outcome of interaction among a range of factors at eight levels: individual factors (patients and families); individual factors (nurses); relationships between healthcare professionals; relationships between patients and nurses; organisational healthcare context; professional and education regulation and standards; community; and social, political and economic. Conclusions Considering these elements as discrete, yet interactive and intertwined forces can be useful in developing interventions to promote ethical practice. We consider this framework to have utility in policy, practice, education and research. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses face ethical challenges on a daily basis, considering these within a social–ecological framework can assist in developing strategies and resolutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Davidson & Cynda Hylton Rushton & Melissa Kurtz & Brian Wise & Debra Jackson & Adam Beaman & Marion Broome, 2018. "A social–ecological framework: A model for addressing ethical practice in nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1233-1241, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e1233-e1241
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14158
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carrie Barron Ausbrooks & Edith Barrett & Maria Martinez-Cosio, 2009. "Ethical Issues in Disaster Research: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 28(1), pages 93-106, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Litchfield, Ian & Perryman, Katherine & Avery, Anthony & Campbell, Stephen & Gill, Paramjit & Greenfield, Sheila, 2021. "From policy to patient: Using a socio-ecological framework to explore the factors influencing safe practice in UK primary care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer A Horney & Gaston A Casillas & Erin Baker & Kahler W Stone & Katie R Kirsch & Krisa Camargo & Terry L Wade & Thomas J McDonald, 2018. "Comparing residential contamination in a Houston environmental justice neighborhood before and after Hurricane Harvey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Daran Gray‐Scholz & Timothy J. Haney & Pamela MacQuarrie, 2019. "Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Geographic and Social Predictors of Flood Risk Awareness," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(11), pages 2543-2558, November.
    3. Mawhinney, Lynnette & Drame, Elizabeth R. & Bowe, Anica G. & Duval-Diop, Dominique & Kares, Faith R. & Santos, Patrizia, 2023. "Responding to the times: Adapting an evaluation study during a dual pandemic," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e1233-e1241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.