IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i5-6pe1068-e1077.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The predictive role of health‐promoting behaviours and perceived stress in aneurysmal rupture

Author

Listed:
  • Mi‐Sun Lee
  • Chang G Park
  • Tonda L Hughes
  • Sang‐Eun Jun
  • Kum Whang
  • Nahyun Kim

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the roles of two modifiable factors—health‐promoting behaviours and perceived stress—in predicting aneurysmal rupture. Background Unruptured intracranial aneurysm detection produces significant stress and anxiety in patients because of the risk of rupture. Compared to nonmodifiable risk factors for rupture such as age, gender and aneurysm size/location, less attention has been given to modifiable risk factors. Two modifiable factors, health‐promoting behaviours and perceived stress, have hardly been examined as potential predictors of rupture. Design This study used a cross‐sectional design. Methods We assessed 155 patients with intracranial aneurysms—that is, subarachnoid haemorrhage (n = 77) or unruptured intracranial aneurysm (n = 78)—to examine (i) baseline characteristics (patient and aneurysmal factors), (ii) health‐related factors (lifestyle habits and health‐promoting behaviour) and (iii) perceived stress levels (psychological stress and physical stress). Patient records provided medical histories and aneurysmal factors; other data were collected using a structured questionnaire addressing lifestyle habits, the Health‐Promoting Lifestyle Profile‐II to measure health‐promoting behaviour and the Perceived Stress Questionnaire to measure perceived‐psychological stress and perceived‐physical stress levels. Results Bivariate analysis indicated that aneurysm rupture risk was associated with female gender, aneurysm size/location, defecation frequency, hyperlipidaemia, sedentary time, low Health‐Promoting Lifestyle Profile‐II mean scores and high perceived‐psychological stress scores. After adjusting for known risk factors, the mean Health‐Promoting Lifestyle Profile‐II and perceived‐psychological stress scores remained robust predictors of rupture. Furthermore, known risk factors combined with these scores had greater predictive power than known risk factors alone. Conclusion Health‐promoting behaviour and psychological stress are promising modifiable factors for reducing risk of aneurysmal rupture. Relevance to clinical practice Our findings may stimulate greater understanding of mechanisms underlying aneurysmal rupture and suggest practical strategies for nurses to employ in optimising conservative management of rupture risk by teaching patients how to modify their risk. Both health‐promoting behaviour and perceived stress should be addressed when designing preventive nursing interventions for patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysm.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi‐Sun Lee & Chang G Park & Tonda L Hughes & Sang‐Eun Jun & Kum Whang & Nahyun Kim, 2018. "The predictive role of health‐promoting behaviours and perceived stress in aneurysmal rupture," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1068-1077, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e1068-e1077
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14149
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yong Sook Yang & Gi Wook Ryu & Insun Yeom & Kyu Won Shim & Mona Choi, 2020. "Stress and mood of adults with moyamoya disease: A cross‐sectional study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 795-802, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e1068-e1077. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.