IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i5-6pe1061-e1067.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Registered nurses’ perceptions of safe care in overcrowded emergency departments

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Eriksson
  • Linda Gellerstedt
  • Pernilla Hillerås
  • Åsa G Craftman

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore registered nurses’ perceptions of safe practice in care for patients with an extended length of stay in the emergency department. Background Extended length of stay and overcrowding in emergency departments are described internationally as one of the most comprehensive challenges of modern emergency care. An emergency department is not designed, equipped or staffed to provide care for prolonged periods of time. This context, combined with a high workload, poses a risk to patient safety, with additional medical errors and an increased number of adverse events. From this perspective, it is important to extend our knowledge and to describe registered nurses’ experiences of safe practice. Design A qualitative, inductive and descriptive study. Methods Qualitative interview study carried out in five emergency departments. Data were analysed using a qualitative content analysis with a latent approach. Results Patient safety meets obstacles in the clinical environment involving experiencing deficiencies regarding patient safety in the clinical setting and the impact of working procedures and routines. Moreover, nurses are challenged in their professional responsibilities involving balancing essential nursing care and actual workload; it is common to experience emotional reactions based on feelings of loss of control. Conclusions From the nurses’ perspective, a prolonged stay in the emergency department may lead to negative consequences for both patient safety and care as well as registered nurses’ psychosocial experiences. An extended length of stay significantly reduces the level of nursing and caring that registered nurses can perform in the emergency department. Relevance to clinical practice This study indicates that emergency departments should review their procedures to avoid both deviations from normal practice and moral stress among registered nurses. This can contribute to an increased understanding and insight about the challenge of patient safety in an emergency department setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Eriksson & Linda Gellerstedt & Pernilla Hillerås & Åsa G Craftman, 2018. "Registered nurses’ perceptions of safe care in overcrowded emergency departments," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 1061-1067, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e1061-e1067
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14143
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wellstood, Katie & Wilson, Kathi & Eyles, John, 2005. ""Unless you went in with your head under your arm": Patient perceptions of emergency room visits," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(11), pages 2363-2373, December.
    2. Robyn Gallagher & Margaret Fry & Lynne Chenoweth & Patrick Gallagher & Jane Stein‐Parbury, 2014. "Emergency department nurses’ perceptions and experiences of providing care for older people," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 449-453, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Björn af Ugglas & Per Lindmarker & Ulf Ekelund & Therese Djärv & Martin J Holzmann, 2021. "Emergency department crowding and mortality in 14 Swedish emergency departments, a cohort study leveraging the Swedish Emergency Registry (SVAR)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Dimitrios Stathopoulos & Eva Ekvall Hansson & Kjerstin Stigmar, 2021. "Exploring the Environment behind In-Patient Falls and Their Relation to Hospital Overcrowdedness—A Register-Based Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Ki Sook Bae & Young Sook Roh, 2020. "Training needs analysis of Korean nurses' neurological assessment competency," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 99-107, March.
    4. Pei-Yu Wang & Pin-Hui Fang & Chen-Long Wu & Hsiang-Chin Hsu & Chih-Hao Lin, 2019. "Workplace Violence in Asian Emergency Medical Services: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Morphet & Kelly Decker & Kimberley Crawford & Kelli Innes & Allison Fiona Williams & Debra Griffiths, 2015. "Aged care residents in the emergency department: the experiences of relatives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3647-3653, December.
    2. Qin, Hong & Prybutok, Victor R., 2013. "A quantitative model for patient behavioral decisions in the urgent care industry," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 50-64.
    3. Jane Stein‐Parbury & Robyn Gallagher & Margaret Fry & Lynn Chenoweth & Patrick Gallagher, 2015. "Expectations and experiences of older people and their carers in relation to emergency department arrival and care: A qualitative study in Australia," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 476-482, December.
    4. Margaret Fry & Glenn Arendts & Lynn Chenoweth, 2017. "Emergency nurses' evaluation of observational pain assessment tools for older people with cognitive impairment," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1281-1290, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:5-6:p:e1061-e1067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.