IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i3-4pe535-e543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence of pressure ulcer and associated risk factors in middle‐ and older‐aged medical inpatients in Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Tove E Børsting
  • Christine R Tvedt
  • Ingrid J Skogestad
  • Tove I Granheim
  • Caryl L Gay
  • Anners Lerdal

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe the prevalence of pressure ulcers among middle‐ and older‐aged patients in a general medical hospital in Norway and to describe the associations between pressure ulcers and potential risk factors additional to the Braden risk score. Background Degrees of mobility, activity, perfusion and skin status are risk factors for development of pressure ulcer. Nurses’ clinical judgements combined with risk assessment tools are effective to detect pressure ulcer risk. Design Cross‐sectional study. Methods The study was performed as part of a research project conducted between September 2012–May 2014 in a general hospital in the capital of Norway. Registered nurses and nursing students collected data from all eligible patients on 10 days during the students’ clinical practice studies. The Braden scale was used to measure pressure ulcer risk, and skin examinations were performed to classify the skin area as normal or as indicative of pressure ulcer according to the definitions by the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Comorbidities were collected by patient's self‐report. This analysis focused on the 255 inpatients at the medical wards ≥52 years of age, most of whom had more than one comorbidity. Results The prevalence of pressure ulcers was 14.9% in this sample. Higher age, underweight, diabetes and worse Braden scores were factors associated with pressure ulcer, and pressure ulcer was most frequently sited at the sacrum or heel. Conclusion Adding age, weight and diabetes status to pressure ulcer risk assessment scales may improve identification of patients at risk for pressure ulcers. Relevance to clinical practice Knowledge about strengths and limitations of risk assessment tools is important for clinical practice. Age, weight and diabetes status should be considered for inclusion in risk assessment tools for pressure ulcers in medical wards.

Suggested Citation

  • Tove E Børsting & Christine R Tvedt & Ingrid J Skogestad & Tove I Granheim & Caryl L Gay & Anners Lerdal, 2018. "Prevalence of pressure ulcer and associated risk factors in middle‐ and older‐aged medical inpatients in Norway," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 535-543, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:e535-e543
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14088
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zena Moore & Seamus Cowman, 2012. "Pressure ulcer prevalence and prevention practices in care of the older person in the Republic of Ireland," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3‐4), pages 362-371, February.
    2. Mariana F Cremasco & Fernanda Wenzel & Suely SV Zanei & Iveth Y Whitaker, 2013. "Pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit: the relationship between nursing workload, illness severity and pressure ulcer risk," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(15-16), pages 2183-2191, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mercedes Fernández-Castro & José-María Jiménez & Belén Martín-Gil & María-Fé Muñoz-Moreno & María-José Castro & María-José Cao & María López, 2021. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Levels of Adherence to the Completion of Nursing Records for Inpatients in Isolation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-8, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad Tubaishat & Panos Papanikolaou & Denis Anthony & Laila Habiballah, 2018. "Pressure Ulcers Prevalence in the Acute Care Setting: A Systematic Review, 2000-2015," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 27(6), pages 643-659, July.
    2. Lorenzo Righi & Aimad Ourahmoune & Nadine Béné & Anne-Claire Rae & Delphine S Courvoisier & Pierre Chopard, 2020. "Effects of a pressure-ulcer audit and feedback regional programme at 1 and 2 years in nursing homes: A prospective longitudinal study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Pedro Sardo & Cláudia Simões & José Alvarelhão & César Costa & Carlos J Simões & Jorge Figueira & João L Simões & Francisco Amado & António Amaro & Elsa Melo, 2015. "Pressure ulcer risk assessment: retrospective analysis of Braden Scale scores in Portuguese hospitalised adult patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3165-3176, November.
    4. Ivan Mwebaza & Godfrey Katende & Sara Groves & Joyce Nankumbi, 2014. "Nurses’ Knowledge, Practices, and Barriers in Care of Patients with Pressure Ulcers in a Ugandan Teaching Hospital," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-6, February.
    5. Dana Tschannen & Christine Anderson, 2020. "The pressure injury predictive model: A framework for hospital‐acquired pressure injuries," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1398-1421, April.
    6. Eva Sving & Lennart Fredriksson & Lena Gunningberg & Anna‐Greta Mamhidir, 2017. "Getting evidence‐based pressure ulcer prevention into practice: a process evaluation of a multifaceted intervention in a hospital setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3200-3211, October.
    7. Qing Zhou & Ting Yu & Yuan Liu & Ruifen Shi & Suping Tian & Chaoxia Yang & Huaxiu Gan & Yanying Zhu & Xia Liang & Ling Wang & Zhenhua Wu & Jinping Huang & Ailing Hu, 2018. "The prevalence and specific characteristics of hospitalised pressure ulcer patients: A multicentre cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 694-704, February.
    8. Seyma Adibelli & Fatos Korkmaz, 2019. "Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care units: Comparison of the reliability and predictive validity of the Braden and Jackson/Cubbin scales," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(23-24), pages 4595-4605, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:e535-e543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.