IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i3-4p859-865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health literacy among caregivers of patients with heart failure: A multicentre cross‐sectional survey

Author

Listed:
  • Carlo Della Pelle
  • Vincenzo Orsatti
  • Francesco Cipollone
  • Giancarlo Cicolini

Abstract

Aims and objectives To assess the levels of health literacy of Italian caregivers of patients with heart failure. Background Health literacy is related to patients’ health outcomes. Low health literacy has been found in older people with heart failure, and less is known on the health literacy of caregivers whose patients are suffering from heart failure. Design Observational, multicentre, cross‐sectional study. Methods From July 2015–May 2016, caregivers were recruited in five hospitals from Central and Southern Italy. To assess health literacy, the Italian version of the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy tool was used. Results A total of 173 caregivers participated in the research, the majority being females (60.1%), aged between 46–60 years (52.6%) and 96 (55.5%) were from Central Italy. 33.5% of caregivers were patients’ children, and 16.2% were paid caregivers of foreign origins. The average level of health literacy was adequate; however, lower levels were found among patients’ spouses and those of older age. Conclusion Our results, in contrast with previous studies, showed adequate health literacy levels of caregivers. However, caregivers older in age and with a low education level showed the lowest health literacy, emphasising the need for healthcare workers, to check caregivers’ health literacy, before entrusting them with the care of patients. Relevance to clinical practice As this research gives, for the first time, an overview on Italian caregivers’ levels of health literacy, its results may be used to improve Italian healthcare professionals’ knowledge of caregivers’ health literacy, before entrusting them with the care of patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlo Della Pelle & Vincenzo Orsatti & Francesco Cipollone & Giancarlo Cicolini, 2018. "Health literacy among caregivers of patients with heart failure: A multicentre cross‐sectional survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 859-865, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:859-865
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14137
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jorien Veldwijk & Iris van der Heide & Jany Rademakers & A. Jantine Schuit & G. Ardine de Wit & Ellen Uiters & Mattijs S. Lambooij, 2015. "Preferences for Vaccination," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(8), pages 948-958, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudia Diederichs & Susanne Jordan & Olga Domanska & Hannelore Neuhauser, 2018. "Health literacy in men and women with cardiovascular diseases and its association with the use of health care services - Results from the population-based GEDA2014/2015-EHIS survey in Germany," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M. & Oppewal, Harmen & Lancsar, Emily, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimag," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    2. Viberg Johansson, Jennifer & Shah, Nisha & Haraldsdóttir, Eik & Bentzen, Heidi Beate & Coy, Sarah & Kaye, Jane & Mascalzoni, Deborah & Veldwijk, Jorien, 2021. "Governance mechanisms for sharing of health data: An approach towards selecting attributes for complex discrete choice experiment studies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Mariusz Duplaga, 2020. "The Acceptance of Key Public Health Interventions by the Polish Population Is Related to Health Literacy, But Not eHealth Literacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Andersson, Alfred & Winslott Hiselius, Lena & Adell, Emeli, 2020. "The effect of marketing messages on the motivation to reduce private car use in different segments," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 22-30.
    5. Edoh Y. Amiran & Joni S. James Charles, 2021. "Reconciling revealed and stated measures for willingness to pay in recreation by building a probability model," Papers 2107.14343, arXiv.org.
    6. Bing Wang & Gang Chen & Julie Ratcliffe & Hossein Haji Ali Afzali & Lynne Giles & Helen Marshall, 2017. "Adolescent values for immunisation programs in Australia: A discrete choice experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.
    7. Luyten, Jeroen & Kessels, Roselinde & Atkins, Katherine E. & Jit, Mark & van Hoek, Albert Jan, 2019. "Quantifying the public's view on social value judgments in vaccine decision-making: A discrete choice experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 181-193.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:3-4:p:859-865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.