IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i23-24p4373-4380.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Triggers and decision‐making patterns for receiving total knee arthroplasty among older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative descriptive study

Author

Listed:
  • Kuo‐Yao Hsu
  • Yun‐Fang Tsai
  • Wen‐Ling Yeh
  • Dave W. Chen
  • Ching‐Yen Chen
  • Yi‐Wen Wang

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore triggers of and decision‐making patterns for older adults with knee osteoarthritis to receive total knee arthroplasty. Background Older adults with knee osteoarthritis pain are often reluctant to undergo total knee arthroplasty until their physical health and psychological health have deteriorated. This delay may lead to poor long‐term outcomes after the surgery. Thus, it is important to help these older adults decide to undergo total knee arthroplasty in an appropriate time frame. Design A qualitative descriptive study. Methods Older adult outpatients scheduled to receive total knee arthroplasty within 1 month (N = 79) were recruited by convenience from two medical centres and one regional hospital in northern Taiwan. Data were collected in individual interviews using a semistructured guide and analysed by thematic analysis. Results The main triggers for older adults to receive total knee arthroplasty were severe pain and inability to walk. We identified four decision‐making patterns for undergoing total knee arthroplasty: tried everything to relieve pain and surgery was the last choice; previously received total knee arthroplasty; perceived oneself as still young and wanted to enjoy life; and adjusted work characteristics, but in vain. Conclusion Healthcare providers of older patients with knee osteoarthritis must carefully assess their characteristics, especially age, occupation and previous total knee arthroplasty, to guide them in deciding to undergo total knee arthroplasty. Clinicians also need to provide appropriate information about osteoarthritis care, pain medications, total knee arthroplasty, the relationship between knee osteoarthritis pain and quality of life, as well as the relationship between preoperative status and postoperative long‐term outcomes for older adults to maintain their quality of life. Relevance to clinical practice Our findings provide evidence for healthcare providers to offer information and support to their older adult patients with knee‐osteoarthritis pain who are deciding whether to undergo total knee arthroplasty.

Suggested Citation

  • Kuo‐Yao Hsu & Yun‐Fang Tsai & Wen‐Ling Yeh & Dave W. Chen & Ching‐Yen Chen & Yi‐Wen Wang, 2018. "Triggers and decision‐making patterns for receiving total knee arthroplasty among older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A qualitative descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(23-24), pages 4373-4380, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:23-24:p:4373-4380
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14557
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14557?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Geert van der Sluis & Jelmer Jager & Ilona Punt & Alexandra Goldbohm & Marjan J. Meinders & Richard Bimmel & Nico L.U. van Meeteren & Maria W. G. Nijhuis-van Der Sanden & Thomas J. Hoogeboom, 2021. "Current Status and Future Prospects for Shared Decision Making before and after Total Knee Replacement Surgery—A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-36, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:23-24:p:4373-4380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.