IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i21-22p4224-4233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

eHealth versus equity: Using a feminist poststructural framework to explore the influence of perinatal eHealth resources on health equity

Author

Listed:
  • Brianna Richardson
  • Lisa Goldberg
  • Megan Aston
  • Marsha Campbell‐Yeo

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore whether and how eHealth resources targeted to families during the perinatal period effectively reach a diverse population or further oppress marginalised groups. Background eHealth is often intended to reach a broad population, thus health content must be relatively generalised which limits the ability to tailor health education and interventions to individual needs. Generalisation of health information has historically represented a hegemonic depiction of the health consumer, especially within the perinatal period, often disregarding the diversity that exists in the world and perpetuating heteronormative constructs within healthcare systems as a result. Design A critical review of the literature regarding perinatal eHealth resources was conducted using a feminist poststructuralist approach for analysis. Included literature addresses the development, implementation and/or evaluation of perinatal eHealth resources. Discussion This approach uncovered hegemonic discourses related to the current state of perinatal eHealth resources. Nurses and midwives have the unique advantage of interacting and understanding diverse populations. Thus, nurses and midwives are integral to the development, implementation and evaluation of eHealth resources to reduce social health inequity. Relevance to clinical practice This paper acts as an exemplar on how to apply feminist poststructuralism to highlight inequities that exist and identifies strategies for nurses and midwives to become involved in the development of eHealth resources or advocate for greater visibility within current resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Brianna Richardson & Lisa Goldberg & Megan Aston & Marsha Campbell‐Yeo, 2018. "eHealth versus equity: Using a feminist poststructural framework to explore the influence of perinatal eHealth resources on health equity," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4224-4233, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:4224-4233
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14592
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14592?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Odette Griscti & Megan Aston & Ruth Martin‐Misener & Deborah Mcleod & Grace Warner, 2016. "The experiences of chronically ill patients and registered nurses when they negotiate patient care in hospital settings: a feminist poststructural approach : A qualitative study that explores negotiat," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(13-14), pages 2028-2039, July.
    2. Christine Cassidy & Lisa Goldberg & Megan Aston, 2016. "The application of a feminist poststructural framework in nursing practice for addressing young women's sexual health," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(15-16), pages 2378-2386, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aimei Mao & Hon Lon Tam & Pak Leng Cheong & Iat Kio Van, 2021. "“You Need to Get Over the Difficulties and Stand Up Again”—A Qualitative Inquiry into Young Nurses’ Coping with Lateral Violence from the Feminist Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:4224-4233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.