IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i21-22p4203-4211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expert in nursing care but sometimes disrespected—Telenurses’ reflections on their work environment and nursing care

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Carin Wahlberg
  • Annica Bjorkman

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe telenurses’ reflections on their work environment and how it impacts on their nursing care. Background Telenursing is one of the largest healthcare settings in Sweden today; approximately 5.5 million care‐seekers call the designated number—1177—each year. Telenursing is regarded as highly qualified nursing care, and providing care over the telephone is considered a complex form of nursing. Within other fields of nursing, the work environment has been shown to affect the outcome of care, patient safety, nurse job satisfaction and burnout. Design The study used a descriptive design and followed the COREQ checklist. Methods Twenty‐four interviews were performed and analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results The main theme concerned “feeling like a nursing care expert but sometimes being disrespected.” The telenurses reported that their work environment supported their work as nursing care experts via the telephone in some respects, but also hindered them. Appreciation and respect they received from the vast majority of callers positively impacted the work environment and contributed to work satisfaction. However, they also felt disrespected by both their employers and healthcare staff; they sometimes felt like a dumping ground. Receiving support from colleagues seemed invaluable in helping them feel like and be a nursing care expert. Conclusion Work was perceived as cognitively demanding and sometimes exhausting, but appreciation from care‐seekers and the feeling of being able to provide qualified nursing care made working as a telenurse worthwhile. Relevance to clinical practice If telenurses are to perform good nursing care over the telephone, managers must provide them with resources, for example, support, education and opportunities for recovery during shifts. It seems that the role of the 1177 service has not been properly implemented and accepted within the healthcare system, and politicians need to anchor its mission within the healthcare organisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Carin Wahlberg & Annica Bjorkman, 2018. "Expert in nursing care but sometimes disrespected—Telenurses’ reflections on their work environment and nursing care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(21-22), pages 4203-4211, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:4203-4211
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14622
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14622?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elenor Kaminsky & Marta Röing & Annica Björkman & Inger K. Holmström, 2017. "Telephone nursing in Sweden: A narrative literature review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 278-286, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Loes T. Wouters & Dorien L. Zwart & Daphne C. Erkelens & Marlies Huijsmans & Arno W. Hoes & Roger A. Damoiseaux & Frans H. Rutten & Esther de Groot, 2020. "Tinkering and overruling the computer decision support system: Working strategies of telephone triage nurses who assess the urgency of callers suspected of having an acute cardiac event," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7-8), pages 1175-1186, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inger K. Holmström & Susan Gustafsson & Josefin Wesström & Karin Skoglund, 2019. "Telephone nurses’ use of a decision support system: An observational study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 501-507, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:21-22:p:4203-4211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.