IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i19-20p3739-3749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postnatal psychosocial assessment and clinical decision‐making, a descriptive study

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah Jane Sims
  • Cathrine Fowler

Abstract

Aims and objectives To describe experienced child and family health nurses’ clinical decision‐making during a postnatal psychosocial assessment. Background Maternal emotional well‐being in the postnatal year optimises parenting and promotes infant development. Psychosocial assessment potentially enables early intervention and reduces the risk of a mental disorder occurring during this time of change. Assessment accuracy and the interventions used are determined by the standard of nursing decision‐making. Design A qualitative methodology was employed to explore decision‐making behaviour when conducting a postnatal psychosocial assessment. Methods This study was conducted in an Australian early parenting organisation. Twelve experienced child and family health nurses were interviewed. A detailed description of a postnatal psychosocial assessment process was obtained using a critical incident technique. Template analysis was used to determine the information domains the nurses accessed, and content analysis was used to determine the nurses’ thinking strategies, to make clinical decisions from this assessment. Results The nurses described 24 domains of information and used 17 thinking strategies, in a variety of combinations. The four information domains most commonly used were parenting, assessment tools, women‐determined issues and sleep. The seven thinking strategies most commonly used were searching for information, forming relationships between the information, recognising a pattern, drawing a conclusion, setting priorities, providing explanations for the information and judging the value of the information. Conclusion The variety and complexity of the clinical decision‐making involved in postnatal psychosocial assessment confirm that the nurses use information appropriately and within their scope of nursing practice. The standard of clinical decision‐making determines the results of the assessment and the optimal access to care. Relevance to clinical practice Knowledge of the information domains and the decision‐making strategies that experienced nurses use for psychosocial assessment potentially improves practice by providing a framework for education and mentoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah Jane Sims & Cathrine Fowler, 2018. "Postnatal psychosocial assessment and clinical decision‐making, a descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3739-3749, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:19-20:p:3739-3749
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14530
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nina Andersson & Birgitta Klang & Gunilla Petersson, 2012. "Differences in clinical reasoning among nurses working in highly specialised paediatric care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(5‐6), pages 870-879, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalliopi Kydonaki & Guro Huby & Jennifer Tocher & Leanne M Aitken, 2016. "Understanding nurses' decision‐making when managing weaning from mechanical ventilation: a study of novice and experienced critical care nurses in Scotland and Greece," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 434-444, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:19-20:p:3739-3749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.