IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i19-20p3613-3621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflicting priorities: Observation of medicine administration

Author

Listed:
  • Johanne Alteren
  • Marit Hermstad
  • Jo White
  • Susan Jordan

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify sources of interruptions and distractions to medicine administration rounds in hospitals. Background Nurses are frequently interrupted during medicine administration. There is no systematic description of nurses' behaviours and interruptions during administration of medicines to patients. Design Exploratory nonparticipant observational study. Methods Three hundred and fifty‐one episodes of medicine administration with 32 nurses from three hospitals in Norway were observed using paper‐based observation grids between December 2013 and March 2014. Results Nurses were frequently interrupted and distracted, mainly by nurses and other healthcare professionals. One‐third of the nurses interrupted their medicine administration: They prioritised helping patients with direct patient care. When the nurses were interrupted, they left the round and re‐entered the procedure. Even so, they managed to refocus and continue to administer the medicines: Interruptions and disturbances made little difference to most behaviours and actions, possibly because nurses double‐checked more frequently. Some differences were seen in behaviours potentially affecting the safety of the medicine administration, such as leaving medicines at the bedside and not helping patients take their medicines. Some interruptions were avoidable, such as those by other nurses and professionals. Conclusions This study offers insights into nurses' behaviours and actions when they are interrupted and distracted during medicine administration. The findings highlight a conflict for nurses administering medicines. Nurses are forced to prioritise between two important activities: direct patient care and medicine administration. Management and education providers need to recognise that nurse interrupting each other is a potential threat to patient safety. Relevance to clinical practice Our data indicate that nurses and other healthcare professionals should be warned not to interrupt colleague administering medicines and managers should ensure other staff are available to respond to patients' immediate needs during medicine rounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanne Alteren & Marit Hermstad & Jo White & Susan Jordan, 2018. "Conflicting priorities: Observation of medicine administration," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3613-3621, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:19-20:p:3613-3621
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14518
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14518
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14518?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siobhan Tranter & Fiona Irvine & Eve Collins, 2012. "Innovations aimed at improving the physical health of the seriously mentally ill: an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(9‐10), pages 1199-1214, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Strunz & Naomi Pua’nani Jiménez & Lisa Gregorius & Walter Hewer & Johannes Pollmanns & Kerstin Viehmann & Frank Jacobi, 2022. "Interventions to Promote the Utilization of Physical Health Care for People with Severe Mental Illness: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Bridget Johnston & Philip Larkin & Michael Connolly & Catriona Barry & Melanie Narayanasamy & Ulrika Östlund & Sonja McIlfatrick, 2015. "Dignity‐conserving care in palliative care settings: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(13-14), pages 1743-1772, July.
    3. Brenda Happell & Chris Platania‐Phung & David Scott, 2014. "Proposed nurse‐led initiatives in improving physical health of people with serious mental illness: a survey of nurses in mental health," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(7-8), pages 1018-1029, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:19-20:p:3613-3621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.