IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i15-16p3008-3019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of evidence‐based nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for emergency nursing: A Delphi study

Author

Listed:
  • Qiao‐Yan Ju
  • Li‐Hua Huang
  • Xue‐Hong Zhao
  • Mei‐Yuan Xing
  • Le‐Wen Shao
  • Mei‐Yun Zhang
  • Rong‐Ya Shao

Abstract

Aims and objectives To establish evidence‐based nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for emergency nursing in China. Background China lacks nursing‐sensitive quality indicators necessary for assessing the quality of emergency nursing and essential to nursing management. Design Prospective. Methods A literature search for relevant evidence‐based studies was performed using several databases from January 2009–May 2014. Previously reported quality indicators were identified as appropriate for assessment by a panel of 40 experts in emergency medicine and nursing. Two successive rounds of Delphi surveys were conducted using questionnaires designed by the experts. Kendal's W coordination coefficients were calculated for indicator importance, rationality of calculation and feasibility of data collection. Results Thirty‐three quality indicators were initially proposed for expert evaluation. After round 1 of expert discussion, Kendal's W coordination coefficients were .152 for importance, .092 for rationality and .141 for feasibility of data collection (all p

Suggested Citation

  • Qiao‐Yan Ju & Li‐Hua Huang & Xue‐Hong Zhao & Mei‐Yuan Xing & Le‐Wen Shao & Mei‐Yun Zhang & Rong‐Ya Shao, 2018. "Development of evidence‐based nursing‐sensitive quality indicators for emergency nursing: A Delphi study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3008-3019, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:15-16:p:3008-3019
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14256
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14256?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:15-16:p:3008-3019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.