IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i11-12p2489-2495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fundamental care and knowledge interests: Implications for nursing science

Author

Listed:
  • José Granero‐Molina
  • Cayetano Fernández‐Sola
  • Ester Mateo‐Aguilar
  • Cayetano Aranda‐Torres
  • Pablo Román‐López
  • José Manuel Hernández‐Padilla

Abstract

Aims and objectives To characterise the intratheoretical interests of knowledge in nursing science as an epistemological framework for fundamental care. Background For Jürgen Habermas, theory does not separate knowledge interests from life. All knowledge, understanding and human research is always interested. Habermas formulated the knowledge interests in empirical‐analytical, historical‐hermeneutic and critical social sciences; but said nothing about health sciences and nursing science. Design Discursive paper. Results The article is organised into five sections that develop our argument about the implications of the Habermasian intratheoretical interests in nursing science and fundamental care: the persistence of a technical interest, the predominance of a practical interest, the importance of an emancipatory interest, “being there” to understand individuals’ experience and an “existential crisis” that uncovers the individual's subjectivity. Conclusions The nursing discipline can take on practical and emancipatory interests (together with a technical interest) as its fundamental knowledge interests. Nurses’ privileged position in the delivery of fundamental care gives them the opportunity to gain a deep understanding of the patient's experience and illness process through physical contact and empathic communication. Relevance to clinical practice and nursing research In clinical, academic and research environments, nurses should highlight the importance of fundamental care, showcasing the value of practical and emancipatory knowledge. This process could help to improve nursing science's leadership, social visibility and idiosyncrasy.

Suggested Citation

  • José Granero‐Molina & Cayetano Fernández‐Sola & Ester Mateo‐Aguilar & Cayetano Aranda‐Torres & Pablo Román‐López & José Manuel Hernández‐Padilla, 2018. "Fundamental care and knowledge interests: Implications for nursing science," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2489-2495, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2489-2495
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14159
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14159?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koelewijn, Wout T. & Ehrenhard, Michel L. & Groen, Aard J. & van Harten, Wim H., 2014. "Exploring personal interests of physicians in hospitals and specialty clinics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 93-98.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yoav Gal & Adiv Gal, 2019. "Knowledge Bias: Neo-feudalism and Other Reasons to Avoid Sharing Knowledge by Knowledge Workers," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 826-848, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2489-2495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.