IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i11-12p2481-2488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building the foundation to generate a fundamental care standardised data set

Author

Listed:
  • Lianne Jeffs
  • Asa Muntlin Athlin
  • Jack Needleman
  • Debra Jackson
  • Alison Kitson

Abstract

Aim and objectives This paper provides an overview of the current state of performance measurement, key trends and a methodological approach to leverage in efforts to generate a standardised data set for fundamental care. Background Considerable transformation is occurring in health care globally with organisations focusing on achieving the quadruple aim of improving the experience of care, the health of populations, and the experience of providing care while reducing per capita costs of health care. In response, healthcare organisations are employing performance measurement and quality improvement methods to achieve the quadruple aim. Despite the plethora of measures available to health managers, there is no standardised data set and virtually no indicators reflecting how patients actually experience the delivery of fundamental care, such as nutrition, hydration, mobility, respect, education and psychosocial support. Conclusions Given the linkages of fundamental care to safety and quality metrics, efforts to build the evidence base and knowledge that captures the impact of enacting fundamental care across the healthcare continuum and lifespan should include generating a routinely collected data set of relevant measures. Relevance to clinical practice This paper provides an overview of the current state of performance measurement, key trends and a methodological approach to leverage in efforts to generate a standardised data set for fundamental care. Standardised data sets enable comparability of data across clinical populations, healthcare sectors, geographic locations and time and provide data about care to support clinical, administrative and health policy decision‐making.

Suggested Citation

  • Lianne Jeffs & Asa Muntlin Athlin & Jack Needleman & Debra Jackson & Alison Kitson, 2018. "Building the foundation to generate a fundamental care standardised data set," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2481-2488, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2481-2488
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14308
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Werley, H.H. & Devine, E.C. & Zorn, C.R. & Ryan, P. & Westra, B.L., 1991. "The Nursing Minimum Data Set: Abstraction tool for standardized, comparable, essential data," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 81(4), pages 421-426.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alvisa Palese & Jessica Longhini & Matteo Danielis, 2021. "To what extent Unfinished Nursing Care tools coincide with the discrete elements of The Fundamentals of Care Framework? A comparative analysis based on a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 239-265, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Federica Dellafiore & Rosario Caruso & Michela Cossu & Sara Russo & Irene Baroni & Serena Barello & Ida Vangone & Marta Acampora & Gianluca Conte & Arianna Magon & Alessandro Stievano & Cristina Arrig, 2022. "The State of the Evidence about the Family and Community Nurse: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Roisin Morris & Padraig MacNeela & Anne Scott & Margaret P Treacy & Abbey Hyde & Anne Matthews & Todd Morrison & Jonathan Drennan & Anne Byrne, 2010. "The Irish nursing minimum data set for mental health – a valid and reliable tool for the collection of standardised nursing data," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3‐4), pages 359-367, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2481-2488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.