IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i11-12p2403-2415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting person‐centred care in the perioperative setting through patient advocacy: An observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Ann‐Sofie Sundqvist
  • Ulrica Nilsson
  • Marie Holmefur
  • Agneta Anderzén‐Carlsson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To examine the extent to which the findings from an integrative review regarding perioperative patient advocacy could be empirically supported, and to describe Swedish registered nurse anaesthetists’ patient advocacy actions and interactions during the perioperative period. Background Patient advocacy is practiced by various healthcare professionals in promoting the well‐being of patients. It is complex, and in a general healthcare context, it has been described as supporting the patients both physiologically and psychologically. During general anaesthesia, the patient enters an unconscious state, and the registered nurse anaesthetist safeguards patient privacy and autonomy. Design Qualitative descriptive. Methods Individual, nonparticipant observations (n = 16) with eight registered nurse anaesthetists. The observer followed the nurses unobtrusively by shadowing them during the perioperative phase on two separate occasions. The analysis was conducted with a directed content analysis in the light of four predetermined categories, identified in a previous integrative review of patient advocacy in the perioperative setting: protecting, value preserving, supporting and informing. Results The predetermined categories were empirically supported. They were further refined by identifying 11 new subcategories leading to a conceptual extension of the theoretical frame. The registered nurse anaesthetists interacted with the patient and all members of the surgical team when practicing perioperative patient advocacy and the actions were mostly initiated by the registered nurse anaesthetists themselves. Conclusions The findings offer a new insight into the registered nurse anaesthetist's professional role. The observations deepen the understanding of the registered nurse anaesthetists’ perioperative patient advocacy actions and can contribute to a more reflective and theory‐oriented view of practice. Relevance to clinical practice The results from this study could be used to help registered nurse anaesthetists and their students understand practice in a more complete and insightful way.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann‐Sofie Sundqvist & Ulrica Nilsson & Marie Holmefur & Agneta Anderzén‐Carlsson, 2018. "Promoting person‐centred care in the perioperative setting through patient advocacy: An observational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2403-2415, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2403-2415
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14181
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14181?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robin Riley & Elizabeth Manias, 2006. "Governing time in operating rooms," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 546-553, May.
    2. Erebouni Arakelian & Christine Leo Swenne & Susan Lindberg & Gudrun Rudolfsson & Ann‐Christin von Vogelsang, 2017. "The meaning of person‐centred care in the perioperative nursing context from the patient's perspective – an integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2527-2544, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. May Bazzi & Maud Lundèn & Karin Ahlberg & Ingegerd Bergbom & Mikael Hellström & Solveig M. Lundgren & Isabell Fridh, 2020. "Patients’ lived experiences of waiting for and undergoing endovascular aortic repair in a hybrid operating room: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 810-820, March.
    2. Hosam Alhakami & Tahani Alsubait & Wajdi Alhakami & Hatim Alhakami & Rushdi Alhakami & Mohammed Alhakami & Raees Ahmad Khan & Md Tarique Jamal Ansari, 2023. "Advancing Sustainable Healthcare through Enhanced Therapeutic Communication with Elderly Patients in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Veronica Ramirez Johansson & Ann‐Christin von Vogelsang, 2019. "Patient‐reported extremity symptoms after robot‐assisted laparoscopic cystectomy," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1708-1718, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:11-12:p:2403-2415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.