IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2pe91-e99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of a webcast on nurses' delivery of tobacco dependence treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Sarna
  • Stella A Bialous
  • Marjorie Wells
  • Jenny Brook

Abstract

Aims and objectives To evaluate an educational programme about nurses' role in tobacco dependence treatment, and its webcast component, on the long‐term impact of increasing the frequency of nurses' self‐reported changes in practice related to delivery of smoking cessation interventions. Background Healthcare professionals' knowledge about evidence‐based tobacco dependence treatment using the 5As framework (Ask about tobacco use, Advise users to quit, Assess willingness to quit, Assist in making a quit plan and Arrange for follow‐up, including referral to a quitline) is essential to increase smoking cessation rates in the United States. Design A 6‐month pre–post design. Methods A convenience sample of nurses (N = 283) from Kentucky and Louisiana was provided access to the webcast and printed toolkit. Responses from those who completed an online survey at baseline, and at 3 or 6 months postimplementation of the educational programme were included in an analysis of changes in the consistent (always/usually) delivery of the 5As plus referral to the quitline. Results After 3 months, the intervention had a significant impact on increasing nurses' reports of consistently providing the 5As to patients who smoked, which was largely sustained at 6 months. Nurses who viewed the webcast were three times more likely to refer smokers to a quitline at 3 months; and four times more likely at 6 months than those who did not. Conclusions An online educational programme, plus printed toolkit about tobacco dependence treatment increased nurses' delivery of smoking cessation interventions over time. This study provided preliminary evidence that including a webcast in a nurse‐targeted educational programme could significantly increase the proportion of nurses who referred smokers to a quitline beyond the benefit of access to printed materials and web‐based resources. Relevance to clinical practice Distance learning is a feasible mechanism for enhancing nurses' involvement in tobacco dependence treatment and promoting evidence‐based clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Sarna & Stella A Bialous & Marjorie Wells & Jenny Brook, 2018. "Impact of a webcast on nurses' delivery of tobacco dependence treatment," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 91-99, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e91-e99
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13875
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lowryanne Vick & Sonia A Duffy & Lee A Ewing & Kathryn Rugen & Connie Zak, 2013. "Implementation of an inpatient smoking cessation programme in a Veterans Affairs facility," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5-6), pages 866-880, March.
    2. Arja Häggman‐Laitila & Lea‐Riitta Mattila & Hanna‐Leena Melender, 2017. "A systematic review of the outcomes of educational interventions relevant to nurses with simultaneous strategies for guideline implementation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3-4), pages 320-340, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne Lunden & Marianne Teräs & Tarja Kvist & Arja Häggman‐Laitila, 2019. "Transformative agency and tensions in knowledge management—A qualitative interview study for nurse leaders," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 969-979, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e91-e99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.