IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2pe345-e353.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pondering practice: Enhancing the art of reflection

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn Hayes
  • Debra Jackson
  • Patricia M. Davidson
  • John Daly
  • Tamara Power

Abstract

Aims and objectives The aim of this study was to describe the effect that immersive simulation experiences and guided reflection can have on the undergraduate nurses' understanding of how stressful environments impact their emotions, performance and ability to implement safe administration of medications. Background Patient safety can be jeopardised if nurses are unsure of how to appropriately manage and respond to interruptions. Medication administration errors are a major patient safety issue and often occur as a consequence of ineffective interruption management. The skills associated with medication administration are most often taught to, and performed by, undergraduate nurses in a controlled environment. However, the clinical environment in which nurses are expected to administer medications is often highly stressed and nurses are frequently interrupted. Design/Methods This study used role‐play simulation and written reflections to facilitate deeper levels of student self‐awareness. A qualitative approach was taken to explore students' understanding of the effects of interruptions on their ability to undertake safe medication administration. Convenience sampling of second‐year undergraduate nursing students enrolled in a medical–surgical subject was used in this study. Data were obtained from 451:528 (85.42%) of those students and analysed using thematic analysis. Results Students reported increasing consciousness and the importance of reflection for evaluating performance and gaining self‐awareness. They described self‐awareness, effective communication, compassion and empathy as significant factors in facilitating self‐efficacy and improved patient care outcomes. Conclusions Following a role‐play simulation experience, student nurses reported new knowledge and skill acquisition related to patient safety, and new awareness of the need for empathetic and compassionate care during medication administration. Practicing medication administration in realistic settings adds to current strategies that aim to reduce medication errors by allowing students to reflect on and in practice and develop strategies to ensure patient safety. Relevance to clinical practice Experiencing clinical scenarios within the safety of simulated environments, offers undergraduate student nurses an opportunity to reflect on practice to provide safer, more empathetic and compassionate care for patients in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn Hayes & Debra Jackson & Patricia M. Davidson & John Daly & Tamara Power, 2018. "Pondering practice: Enhancing the art of reflection," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 345-353, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e345-e353
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13876
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Debra Jackson & Garry Walter & John Daly & Michelle Cleary, 2014. "Editorial: Multiple outputs from single studies: acceptable division of findings vs. ‘salami’ slicing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1-2), pages 1-2, January.
    2. Carolyn Hayes & Debra Jackson & Patricia M Davidson & Tamara Power, 2015. "Medication errors in hospitals: a literature review of disruptions to nursing practice during medication administration," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3063-3076, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wesley Mendes-Da-Silva & Cristiana Cerqueira Leal, 2021. "Salami Science in the Age of Open Data: Déjà lu and Accountability in Management and Business Research," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(1), pages 200194-2001.
    2. Carolyn Hayes & Debra Jackson & Patricia M. Davidson & John Daly & Tamara Power, 2017. "Calm to chaos: Engaging undergraduate nursing students with the complex nature of interruptions during medication administration," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4839-4847, December.
    3. Shuzhi Lin & Ningsheng Wang & Biqi Ren & Shuang Lei & Bianling Feng, 2022. "Use of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for Risk Analysis of Drug Use in Patients with Lung Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Michelle Cleary & Kim Usher & Debra Jackson, 2015. "Editorial: Money, money, money: not so funny in the research world," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 611-613, March.
    5. Fakhradin Ghasemi & Mohammad Babamiri & Zahra Pashootan, 2022. "A comprehensive method for the quantification of medication error probability based on fuzzy SLIM," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Mehammed Adem Getnet & Berhanu Boru Bifftu, 2017. "Work Interruption Experienced by Nurses during Medication Administration Process and Associated Factors, Northwest Ethiopia," Nursing Research and Practice, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-7, November.
    7. Ginger Schroers, 2018. "Characteristics of interruptions during medication administration: An integrative review of direct observational studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3462-3471, October.
    8. Graeme D Smith & Carol Haigh & Debra Jackson, 2015. "Editorial: Ensuring standards in publication ethics," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1-2), pages 1-3, January.
    9. Debra Jackson & Caroline Bradbury‐Jones, 2020. "Top ten reasons papers are rejected during initial screening and some tips to avoid early rejection," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 3899-3900, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:e345-e353. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.