IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2p247-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anticipatory vigilance: A grounded theory study of minimising risk within the perioperative setting

Author

Listed:
  • Brid O'Brien
  • Tom Andrews
  • Eileen Savage

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore and explain how nurses minimise risk in the perioperative setting. Background Perioperative nurses care for patients who are having surgery or other invasive explorative procedures. Perioperative care is increasingly focused on how to improve patient safety. Safety and risk management is a global priority for health services in reducing risk. Many studies have explored safety within the healthcare settings. However, little is known about how nurses minimise risk in the perioperative setting. Design Classic grounded theory. Methods Ethical approval was granted for all aspects of the study. Thirty‐seven nurses working in 11 different perioperative settings in Ireland were interviewed and 33 hr of nonparticipant observation was undertaken. Concurrent data collection and analysis was undertaken using theoretical sampling. Constant comparative method, coding and memoing and were used to analyse the data. Results Participants’ main concern was how to minimise risk. Participants resolved this through engaging in anticipatory vigilance (core category). This strategy consisted of orchestrating, routinising and momentary adapting. Conclusion Understanding the strategies of anticipatory vigilance extends and provides an in‐depth explanation of how nurses’ behaviour ensures that risk is minimised in a complex high‐risk perioperative setting. This is the first theory situated in the perioperative area for nurses. Relevance to clinical practice This theory provides a guide and understanding for nurses working in the perioperative setting on how to minimise risk. It makes perioperative nursing visible enabling positive patient outcomes. This research suggests the need for training and education in maintaining safety and minimising risk in the perioperative setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Brid O'Brien & Tom Andrews & Eileen Savage, 2018. "Anticipatory vigilance: A grounded theory study of minimising risk within the perioperative setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 247-256, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:247-256
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13881
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13881?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Warburton, Rebecca Nunn, 2005. "Patient safety -- how much is enough?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 223-232, February.
    2. Satu Rauta & Sanna Salanterä & Jarmo Nivalainen & Kristiina Junttila, 2013. "Validation of the core elements of perioperative nursing," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(9-10), pages 1391-1399, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fukuda, Haruhisa & Imanaka, Yuichi & Hirose, Masahiro & Hayashida, Kenshi, 2008. "Economic evaluations of maintaining patient safety systems in teaching hospitals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2-3), pages 381-391, December.
    2. Fukuda, Haruhisa & Imanaka, Yuichi & Hayashida, Kenshi, 2008. "Cost of hospital-wide activities to improve patient safety and infection control: A multi-centre study in Japan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 100-111, July.
    3. Mahmood Nekoei‐Moghadam & Mehdi Raadabadi & Majid Heidarijamebozorgi, 2020. "Patient safety culture in university hospital's emergency departments: A case study," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 852-858, July.
    4. Chih-Ming Luo & Hung-Fan Chang, 2013. "Safety process innovation in medical service industry," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2915-2931, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:247-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.