IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2p205-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The double‐edged experience of healthcare encounters among women with endometriosis: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Hanna Grundström
  • Siw Alehagen
  • Preben Kjølhede
  • Carina Berterö

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify and describe the experience of healthcare encounters among women with endometriosis. Background Endometriosis is a “hidden” chronic gynaecological disease appearing in every 10th woman of fertile age. Different manifestations of pain are the main symptoms, often leading to impaired physical and mental health, and lower quality of life. Previous research on healthcare experiences among women with endometriosis has focused on diagnostic delay and experiences of encountering general practitioners. Design A qualitative, interpretive, phenomenological approach was used. Methods We interviewed nine women aged 23–55, with a laparoscopy‐confirmed diagnosis of endometriosis. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed following the steps of the interpretive phenomenological approach. Results Two themes were identified in the interview transcripts: being treated with ignorance and being acknowledged. The essence: “the double‐edged experience of healthcare encounters” emerged from the themes. The women's experience was double‐edged as it involved contradictory feelings: the encounters were experienced as both destructive or constructive. On the one hand, the destructive side was characterised by ignorance, exposure and disbelief. On the other hand, the constructive side made the women feel acknowledged and confirmed, boosting their self‐esteem. Conclusions The new and important aspects of the findings are that the experience of healthcare encounters is for the first time expressed as double‐edged: both destructive and constructive. The experience was of specific importance as it affected the women's perceptions of themselves and of their bodies. Relevance to clinical practice The information about the constructive side of the experience is of clinical valuable for all healthcare professionals (nurses, midwives and doctors) encountering these women, as it provides a new level of understanding of the experiences. The findings demonstrate both psychological and practical aspects that can help professionals to improve the encounters.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna Grundström & Siw Alehagen & Preben Kjølhede & Carina Berterö, 2018. "The double‐edged experience of healthcare encounters among women with endometriosis: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 205-211, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:205-211
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13872
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13872?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seear, Kate, 2009. "The etiquette of endometriosis: Stigmatisation, menstrual concealment and the diagnostic delay," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1220-1227, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sadie Bergen & Doris Murimi & Caitlin Gruer & Gibson Munene & Atunga Nyachieo & Maureen Owiti & Marni Sommer, 2023. "Living with Endometriosis: A Narrative Analysis of the Experiences of Kenyan Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-12, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Supriya Garikipati & Penelope A. Phillips-Howard, 2022. "Information, Choice and Menstrual Outcomes: Evidence from a CommunityBased Intervention in Indi," Working Papers 202211, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    2. Berndt, Virginia Kuulei & Bell, Ann V., 2024. "Beyond knowledge: Introducing embodied aversion through the case of contraception," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 341(C).
    3. Elia Fernández-Martínez & Ana Abreu-Sánchez & Juan Francisco Velarde-García & María Teresa Iglesias-López & Jorge Pérez-Corrales & Domingo Palacios-Ceña, 2020. "Living with Restrictions. The Perspective of Nursing Students with Primary Dysmenorrhea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Luigi Della Corte & Claudia Di Filippo & Olimpia Gabrielli & Sabrina Reppuccia & Valentina Lucia La Rosa & Rosalia Ragusa & Michele Fichera & Elena Commodari & Giuseppe Bifulco & Pierluigi Giampaolino, 2020. "The Burden of Endometriosis on Women’s Lifespan: A Narrative Overview on Quality of Life and Psychosocial Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo & Ángela María Ortega-Galán & María Teresa Iglesias-López & Ana Abreu-Sánchez & Elia Fernández-Martínez, 2020. "Why Do Some Spanish Nursing Students with Menstrual Pain Fail to Consult Healthcare Professionals?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Supriya Garikipati & Penelope A. Phillips-Howard, 2021. "What’s the Bleeding Problem? Period Poverty, Information Failure and Consumer Preferences in the Global South," Working Papers 202107, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    7. Federica Facchin & Laura Buggio & Dhouha Dridi & Giussy Barbara & Paolo Vercellini, 2021. "The Subjective Experience of Dyspareunia in Women with Endometriosis: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis of Qualitative Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Ana Abreu-Sánchez & María Laura Parra-Fernández & María Dolores Onieva-Zafra & Elia Fernández-Martínez, 2020. "Perception of Menstrual Normality and Abnormality in Spanish Female Nursing Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-12, September.
    9. Elia Fernández-Martínez & Ana Abreu-Sánchez & Jorge Pérez-Corrales & Javier Ruiz-Castillo & Juan Francisco Velarde-García & Domingo Palacios-Ceña, 2020. "Living with Pain and Looking for a Safe Environment: A Qualitative Study among Nursing Students with Dysmenorrhea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Punita Bhatt & Supriya Garikipati, 2021. "Culture, Collectivism and Empowerment: The Role of Feminist Ideologies in Women’s Work and Organization," Working Papers 202108, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:205-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.