IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i9-10p1189-1203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What is the existing evidence supporting the efficacy of compression bandage systems containing both elastic and inelastic components (mixed‐component systems)? A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Lynn Welsh

Abstract

Aims and objectives To analyse current evidence on the efficacy of bandage systems containing both elastic and inelastic components (mixed‐component systems). Background International consensus on the efficacy of types of compression systems is difficult to achieve; however, mixed‐component systems are being promoted as combining the best properties of both elastic and inelastic bandage systems and increasingly being used to treat venous leg ulcers in practice. Design A systematic literature review. Methods Search terms such as venous leg ulcer, varicose ulcer, leg ulcer, compression, bandage, elastic, inelastic, short stretch, healing rate, interface pressure, mixed component, two‐layer, four‐layer and multi‐layer were used in database and hand searches in several combinations. Limits were set for years 2005–March 2015 and English‐language publications. Results A total of 475 studies were identified at initial search, and following elimination from abstract and title, this was reduced to 7. A further study was identified on Google Scholar, bringing the final number of studies fitting inclusion criteria to 8. The following subgroups relating to outcomes of efficacy were identified: ulcer healing, maintenance of interface pressure, slippage, ease of application and patient quality of life. Conclusions Mixed‐component systems were found to have comparable ulcer healing rates to alternative compression systems and be easy to apply; have similar abilities to maintain pressure as four‐layer bandages and better abilities than short‐stretch bandages; have less slippage than alternative systems; and to be significantly associated with several favourable quality of life outcomes. Clinician skill in bandage application was an uncontrolled variable in all eight papers included in the review, which may limit reliability of findings. Relevance to clinical practice This review synthesises existing evidence on the efficacy of mixed‐component systems and encourages clinicians to regard them as an effective alternative to purely elastic or inelastic compression systems. Additionally, it highlights the importance of clinician skill in bandage application as a crucial determinant of effective compression.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynn Welsh, 2017. "What is the existing evidence supporting the efficacy of compression bandage systems containing both elastic and inelastic components (mixed‐component systems)? A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(9-10), pages 1189-1203, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:9-10:p:1189-1203
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13611
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13611?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:9-10:p:1189-1203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.